Member Info for SpotTheNutters

A poster, can't recall who, wrote that on the Aquis Exchange, the Holding RNS requirements are at a different level to the LSE Exchanges, at a 10% Holding level, rather than 3%.

I spoke to Aquis today, and the requirements are the same on Aquis, anything over 3%, including changes, should be reported, whether an increase or decrease, or whether they go below 3%.

I also asked why Peel Hunt was treating the Aquis exchange like the 'wild west' and not providing the quantity of their remaining holding, as in the RNS on the 21st, where it just states 'Below 10%'. They said they're going to address it. We'll see.

Fourprinces

Succinctly put, good post.

What have I started ? 😅

My post was intended to be lighthearted, after turning up at Berwick upon Tweed and being confronted by a miserable scene, haha ! 😅

Now, that proves you're not honest.

It's cold, it's miserable and it has dreadful places like Berwick upon Tweed, with a big slab of concrete dumped in the middle of naff pocket handkerchief beach, which stinks ! 😅

Even the locals don't like it.

"WeShop going public is the final piece of the Circle of Trust. By listing its shares on one of the greatest and internationally recognized stock exchanges in the world, WeShop establishes transparency, liquidity and allows its users to receive their shares in WeShop. The stock market allows WeShop to communicate to its users that they can be safe knowing that THEIR company is being run properly and efficiently.

Growth opportunity

Clear revenue and community growth strategies.

As the Company aims to expand into offering other products and services that consumers need and desire, we believe we can encourage people to increase their monthly spend through the WeShop platform. Services such as insurance are used by the vast majority of people and by entering these industries, WeShop will allow users to receive ownership of WeShop while making their planned purchases of these services.

The Board is driven by margin and making the Company as profitable as possible. Through increased volumes come increased revenues and margin in both affiliate and advertising. We are already looking at international opportunities to launch WeShop to increase the user numbers over the coming years.

Value

Created by the community, for the community.

WeShop’s culture is one of being here to serve the community by being as operationally efficient as possible to drive profitable financial results with the aim of promoting value growth in WeShop shares. This is not just a company. It is a community. This is not e-commerce, this is We-Commerce.

Summary

In the world right now, people are shopping online, collecting loyalty rewards, looking for secondary and passive income while recommending products to friends and seeking recommendations from friends and influencers. At the same time, people are interested in companies and investing in them more than ever, and those markets continue to reflect value of companies in a regulated environment. We have created a Circle of Trust in an ever-growing and dynamic segment of the world economy.

This is how We Shop. This is how We Share. This is how we make WeShop yours.

-WeShop Board of Directors"

Agree.

Well, at least that's another expression to add to the repertoire.

"What a bunch of complete Peel Hunt's !" 😅

Veteran

Two approaches that WCAP should take to help balance the disparity on the valuation.

Firstly, do an Institutional Investor sales round and encourage other II's to take a significant holding, which would dilute the negative effects of a Peel Hunt.

Secondly, get off the Aquis exchange which remains 'niche' in the Uk and doesn't come under the regular gaze of the majority of PI's. Go on to AIM or other on the LSE exchanges.

The intraday 'seismic activity chart' type pricing behaviour on Aquis scares the hell out of many.

This posted on A.d.v.f.n. about 7 Million + Members ....

______

"The app has a 7 million plus waiting list to process new members

They need to release this news to the market

Down load the APP c if it’s cleared"

_______

If that's true, WSHP's forecast annual spend per member was $ 2k to $ 5k.

That would equate to $ 14 Billion to $ 35 Billion of annual sales.

Other posters have highlighted that US stocks in the sector are valued at 20 to 30 times the annual turnover.

Lowest end of $ 14 Billion x 20 is $ 280 Billion.

On Tennysons numbers, $ 4.4 Billion Market Cap for WSHP is $ 400 per share and a read through value to WCAP of 87p per share.

$ 280 Billion is over 60 times $ 4.4 Billion and equally, over 60:times the read through value of 87p to WCAP, which is roughly £50 per WCAP share.

Those numbers sound ridiculous, but it's the USA with 12 Million Yanks who identify themselves as 'full-time influencers' and they'll be all over WSHP, which may explain the post about a 7 Million + waiting list.

Alwayshoping

Yes, it could be the mother of all rises if it were to transpire. 🙂

There's nothing stopping Peel from taking profit from their selling, which is already evident, announcing in their Results on Monday the additional profit they've made, which they promised to do in their Results in June, and keeping the price low enough to start buying back in after the Results.

We'll find out either way soon enough.

Magpie

It wasn't in reference to your post at all.

Mont

There are a few doom mongers who will always try to justify their 'analysis' based on a two hour period, normally when a price has partly retraced. Their theories dissipate when the price rises, such as yesterday.

Both

I'm using ii

It's a bit like watching a seismic activity chart just before an eruption.

You could drive yourself mad with '3.4, great !', '2.9, wtf ?', '3.4475, great !' .... ad nauseum.

That's the Aquis exchange. Not for the faint hearted.

As predicted.

Aquis exchange literally puts the last price paid or sold, it doesn't provide a smoother price bid and offer in the same way as an LSE exchange.

3.44 being paid

3.3 to sell

At the moment, which can change up or down in seconds.

What's that got to do with the valuation of WSHP ?

Er, that'll be 'nothing at all' then.

It's called 'share splits'. If it's a 2 for 1, if you had one share previously, you then own two instead.

AMZN listed in 1997 with 23 Million shares.

Today, it has over 10.6 Billion shares.

Clearly, it's never been an issue for their valuation.