Member Info for SpotTheNutters

What's that got to do with the valuation of WSHP ?

Er, that'll be 'nothing at all' then.

It's called 'share splits'. If it's a 2 for 1, if you had one share previously, you then own two instead.

AMZN listed in 1997 with 23 Million shares.

Today, it has over 10.6 Billion shares.

Clearly, it's never been an issue for their valuation.

Cheety

Those sums may be a bit askew.

£ 10k's worth of WCAP at 3p should be valued at roughly £ 156k if the 47p WSHP valuation was applied.

Read across value 47p now.

WSHP $220

Giovs

$ 165 on WSHP has a read through valuation from Tennyson for WCAP at 35p.

Wado

'Which name will u be useing then @Gordon ?'

Nice to see you spotted that too. 😅

It's obvious that Peel were 'talking up' their results and performance. Even if you take out the restructuring causing the loss, their profit would have a been a measly £800k, which is less than a 1% margin.

It's similar to you trying your best to 'talk down' WCAP. Just as obvious, 10Gordon10.

Posted earlier Jester

_____

Now that I understand Peel's dreadful financial performance announced in June with a mere £800k 'adjusted' profit, less than 1% margin, once they're out, if they're not already, the price action should be based mainly on PI's demand rather than being squashed by Peel.

Peel's results due in December will be their priority and the approximate 80 Million shares they had, if bought for 1p and sold for 3p, will nett them roughly £ 1.6 Million, which would be twice the entire profit they made in the previous twelve months.

No surprise they were desperate to sell before December.

JPP, it's an unknown until the large sells from Peel stop. They haven't got long to shift them though, Peels results are due on Monday.

368800

The moment you get a personality, I'll do just that.

I think you've got more than enough of your own imagination, 36800.

From your earlier post:

"I love it when the MMs read my post and react"

Delusions of grandeur. They don't give a sh.1.t what you write. You're of no significance to them at all.

I think JPP was trying to tie up a trade placed with the last three digits of the number of Peel shares announced on the 20th, which sometimes happens when a holder is clearing out the last of their stock.

Think it was 317 at the end though, not 371.

Now that I understand Peel's dreadful financial performance announced in June with a mere £800k 'adjusted' profit, less than 1% margin, once they're out, if they're not already, the price action should be based mainly on PI's demand rather than being squashed by Peel.

Peel's results due in December will be their priority and the approximate 80 Million shares they had, if bought for 1p and sold for 3p, will nett them roughly £ 1.6 Million, which would be twice the entire profit they made in the previous twelve months.

No surprise they were desperate to sell before December.

The words are below from the Audioboom Link:

1:07:25

_______________________

"There's been all sorts of rumours that one of the big VC's companies in the US have been sniffing around taking a good portion of shares and one of the places that they could take that from is Wecap.

There was a report that a $300 Million Dollar offer was possible for the whole of Wecaps shares which would be basically giving a 15 bagger from here.

And that's not going to have to wait for a tie in for six months .... that would just be a straight buyout. "

_________________

Torino

If you extend that thought process further. the US has over four times the population of the Uk.

Consider the £ turnover in the Uk, convert it to USD, multiply it by 4.3 (population difference), and you're near to $ 1 Billion revenue.

So, based on the way the poster describes US valuations on 20 to 30 times revenue, it would stack up.

Davey

You were around years ago when GKP first hit oil but despite that, an II was liquidating their position because they were wanted or needed the cash.

Nobody could understand why it stayed at 2.5 p (ish), or why the II was selling until after they'd offloaded, then when they stopped selling, it shot to 25p, partially retraced, then raced up to over a £1. Different sector but the wish for the II to offload for financial reasons, or in this case, Peel Hunt to shore up forthcoming Results, could have some bearing when you read the Peel Hunt Results in June this year.

_______

16 June 2025

Peel Hunt Limited

Full-Year Results for the year ended 31 March 2025

o The Group produced a loss before tax (LBT) of £3.5m (FY24: LBT £3.3m), due to an increase in our costs, predominantly from exceptional Group restructuring costs. On an adjusted basis1 the Group was profitable with a profit before tax of £0.8m (FY24: adjusted LBT £2.7m)

__________

Their turnover increased, yet they're still making next to no profit, so 'busy fool' syndrome.

'Adjusted', they made £800k. That's next to nothing considering the turnover.

They'll be keen not to wait and to take any profit they can in haste, to shore up their performance, which considering their turnover, is really poor. They've got their Results due in December, so they'll be keen to show an improvement on June's Results.

Ability to sell:

In the Terms put on here by other posters::

'except with the prior written consent of the Board'

So, if they have prior written consent, on the basis of those Terms, assuming those Terms are accurate and apply, they could sell.

The read across to WeCap from Tennyson remains the same.

_______

43p at $ 200 WSHP

32p at $ 150 WSHP

21p at $ 100 WSHP

Jane

I'm definitely 'Hodling' ! 😀