Member Info for Spikeyj

Slow but steady.

TBoB, the country is ukraine, not “the ukraine”.

Bl**dy h*ll, i seem to be accidentally agreeing with gecko, feel slightly sick.

50 days gives trump time to change his mind and lie about putin etc. at least 50 more times.

15:16 EUA was trying to sell its so-called assets long before putin sent in his tanks, rapists, murderers and child kidnappers, including a very lengthy failed formal sale process.

EUA couldn’t sell any of its stuff, even *before* the russian invasion.

trump and putin can agree or disagree about whatever they want, but it won’t make any difference whatsoever to the amount and quality of metals EUA has rights to, how much it would cost to extract, process, store and market them, and it won’t make any meaningful difference to the prices such metals sell for.

(… meanwhile, clock keeps on ticking re licence lengths and potential life of mine…)

Chelsea, it’s six figure money for f*** all work, year after year, and zero risk …. plenty of folks would be happy to do it. plenty of staff at spoons or greggs would do it just as well and communicate better.

I doubt that cs loses any sleep over chatter by bulletin board pis.

Changes re putin’s war etc / trump’s gecko-like flip-flopping etc. will make zero difference to the underlying value (or lack thereof) in eua’s so-called assets.

No sarcasm at all intended on my part. i mean it quite seriously.

i think cs has a very nice gig going here for himself, whereby he collects a nice six figure sum each year for doing very very little.

…. & just so long as he can keep enough people believing in the company to sustain occasional placings, he can keep on collecting that pension top up indefinitely…

(i think he knows perfectly well he’s gonna make more money that way than by selling the so-called assets for what would only be a nugatory price. jmo.)

… snouts in the trough at lifestyle companies all round.

CS is already effectively retired, it’s just that he gets a nice annual pension top-up from his EUA role which is a sinecure, no work needed.

… so, zero evidence at all then.

(and how do you account for the head of the relevant division at j&j stating that it is a lie if someone is claiming cloudtag and j&j have done a deal?)

Bringmeriches 8th july 22:36, “Research…” that’s a bit vague, to put it mildly — please explain what that research was, and how the results evidence cloudtag involvement with j&j?

19:16, it’s gecko, not me, who repeatedly mentions that i used to be a market maker. i don’t know why he does that, but that’s his issue, not mine.

me personally, i don’t think that being a market maker is/was a particularly important or special thing. hence, why i’ve been doing other things for the last few decades.

… & as per usual, all this is yet more off topic froth, since there is very little meaningful to discuss wrt EUA, since it’s just a licence squatting company doing very little.

Chessgambiteer, you should read more carefully.

i didn’t say that AIM market makers are cr*ppy … i have no view on that, one way or the other.

rather, i said that AIM equities are cr*ppy (tbf, not all of them, but the great majority are, imv, including EUA).

14:57, don’t be silly, gecko, i was a market maker in foreign exchange derivatives back in the 1980s, not a market maker in cr*ppy AIM equities in the 2020s. … very different kind of markets, very different kinds of rules. pay attention, fellah.

i don’t think the dual astana listing will make any much meaningful difference to the potential investor base. it’s just the same kind of rampy gimmick used by many other AIM companies to have some pseudo-news around which to pump the shares.

The London market is fully accessible to the vast majority of potential brics investors, welcher.

09:45, but if those “lovely BRICS nation investors” wanted to buy EUA shares, they could already do so in london, no need to wait for kaz listing.

(… except for a very small number of russkie war criminals / child abductors whose cash ain’t welcome in uk… but presumably that’s not where EUA hopes lie?)

“I for one do believe that Cloudtag are one of the partners working with the Polyphonic - Johnson and Johnson MedTech’s digital ecosystem.”

? & why do you believe that? .. cloudtag has provided absolutely zero evidence to support that.

Mr_w, and also yet another day when rampers try to claim that EUA supposedly receiving “non-binding offers” years ago meant something positive.

EUA never gave out any info about the supposed level of such offers, what exactly the offers were meant to be for, and who the offers were from, and on what timescale and payment terms. zero genuine supporting or explanatory info.

a ‘non-binding’ offer means diddly squat anyway, since there is zero commitment to anything real happening. … stuff like non-binding memoranda of understanding, ‘potential interest’, etc etc all bog standard smoke and mirrors in the AIM cesspit.