Member Info for Spikeyj

(i probably wouldn’t phrase it quite like mr_w did, i don’t have his pithy flair, but in a broad sense i tend to agree with his overall stance of giving very little credence to anything much this company has said for years. lots of it just seem like smoke and mirrors, very deliberate, and things like the use of the ACF report, zak, attempted use of optimo, richie and friends, stink to high heaven … v v v similar imv to deep red flags on other such shares.)

Hi del. imv one of the biggest snags of all about EUA is simply that the company has never published enough information for anyone, myself included, to make sensible calculations about value in the first place.

for me, it is especially telling that they say they been trying to sell their stuff for ages, but there is no independently verifiable evidence that anyone wants to buy it for a meaningful sum.

it is also very telling imv that in the absence of assets sales, EUA has not continued to mine any non-trivial amounts, they have not activated sinosteel or similar, and they aren’t even trying to actively prove things up more with infill drilling programs etc (…. notice, punter doesn’t make any attempt to explain what exploration he claims EUA are doing.).

that was the case before putin’s invasion too, not just a recent phase.

people on this site go on and on about what they think EUA has ‘in the ground’, but even begging the ticklish questions about what grade cut-offs they use, and what status different quantities would have in categorisation systems, etc the big big questions concern the economic viability of location, extraction, processing.

it is no good at owning rights to stuff in the ground if it simply ain’t commercial to exploit. i would want to see EUA produce full DFS then BFS. red flag that they don’t release such.

… but please do tell us about the exploration work that you think EUA is doing, punter.

At best, the mining at WK was just a pr stunt.

they lose money every time they mine there.

that’s why they stopped.

Reserves? - resources? estimated, inferred, etc etc …. many folks on here don’t seem to understand the differences.

meanwhile, mining would be an easy game if it was only about what might be in the ground …. locating, extracting and processing in an economically viable way is a whole different ballgame.

that’s why EUA isn’t really a mining company ( -please feel to quote me on that as many times as you wish, officepuntercat -). it’s just a licence squatter making up end-of-rainbow stories to promote its only meaningful product to pis, i.e. its own shares.

The groupthink, confirmation bias and ramper tactics were pretty similar, along with the jam tomorrow games played by that company to squeeze unwary pis dry. many AIM ‘resource’ companies are like that.

matthew was very new to shares when he got in there, but this time round he could reflect on that experience and be a bit less naive about AIM, telegram groups, etc. (but of course, that’s down to him either way.)

10:57, yup.

… still here, added recently, but more so in veil.

Https://www.thetimes.com/article/8faa771e-e115-4c68-a76f-14bed0e2b2c4?shareToken=ac34bfefc36981e65eaf80a949a14147

Matthew, learn your lesson from copl. gl.

“…our new NED…”

LOL! - don’t ever change, guys.

Whe4to 26/5/23, 13:34 is also good for a belly laugh.

C.f. trombone’s post of 09:33 on 15/7, lol.

The attempted bitkogan telegrammer group pump makes it a little clearer what the kaz listing is about. i.e. EUA has been running out of mug punters based in london who are willing to p*** even more money up the wall, —->> so now they need to try to find another pool of greedy & gullible russkie pis who can take over as the targeted suckers to buy shares on ramps.

it’s a bit of giveaway that there hasn’t really been any surge in volume or price in london, even with the AIX trading imminent … too many UK pis have already had too many EUA shares shoved down their throats at too high a price, too many stale bulls in london.

so welcome on board little ivans, time for you to take the strain and carry the baby for a while.

Had amit actually told some pis what RMG was meant to stand for? - the cloudtag website & update didn’t specify, which was pretty weaselly, as per usual.

Gecko, I just offer my own honest opinions on a share which i find interesting. i don’t care one way or the other whether you or others buy more, hold or sell, it makes absolutely no difference to me.

I’m not trying to convince you to sell, wilco, you’re a big boy, entirely your own decision. i don’t mind what you do.

(If anything, if I really really had to make a recommendation, i’d probably suggest people like wilco, welcher, punter and gecko should buy loads more.)

Again, to be fair, I’ve also told the KIA about bellastar’s bitkogan stuff, as i’m sure they will be very convinced by that too. so watch out for a TR1 from the KIA shortly, or imminently.

“indepenant [sic], official large investors…”

I do wonder what independent and official mean in this context…. ‘independent’ of what exactly? / & ‘official’ according to what authority?

… the odd thing is, wilco, that usually if a ‘big investor’ is thinking about buying into something they tend to tell people about it after they purchase, not before. …

but maybe dodgy russian oligarchs sanctioned for complicity in war crimes do things differently, eh?