Member Info for Spikeyj

Seems a tad overdone. bought some.

You naughty deramper, you, stretch! ….you are certainly earning your 10p per post — i suggest that all genuine LTHs green box stretch (whatever that means).

17:38, how bizarre!

- … surprised to hear Chelsea/datttta has children still in some contact with him - ? wonder which alias they know him by?

…. Lse chat boards are full of remarkably successful hindsight traders …. but rather more impressive (credible) tho’ if folks post when they sell, rather than claim way after …

Best BoD on AIM, that’s what they used to say here.

Although i suppose they could probably send an evri courier to collect those nice gingham tablecloths from the canteen before medvedev et al seize ‘em.

16:33: “…the Baord [sic] needs to have a clear emergency program for urgent redomiciliation.”

? how on earth could a london based company ‘redomicile’ to the UK licences issued by the russian state regarding mines in the frozen kola region in north-west russia?? … i mean, they can hardly pick up the mines and bodily transport them to the midlands, can they?

…unless they can sell those licences pronto and repatriate such company funds back to london without putin seizing them, the company ‘assets’ are just firmly located and stuck in russia.

I think there is an ongoing misunderstanding on this chatboard about broker research coverage?

RNS 21/8/25: “ …The Company expects better liquidity in the secondary market of its ordinary shares on AIX after initiation of the research coverage on Eurasia by international brokers active on AIX that is expected this week or next week.”

the thing is, that has *already happened*, with the release of that so-called ‘research’ report by mind money, which is an online broker based in cyprus particularly focused on retail pis in russia and some ex-soviet countries ——> in other words, an international broker “active on AIX”.

sure, it doesn’t seem to have had much effect, but wilco seems to be missing the point by waiting for something that’s actually already out.

I can certainly see your point. atb & gl, whatever your call.

09:42, paid by whom? - don’t be silly!

(snag being, some folks who can’t cope with opinions that differ from them try to define the chatboard as ‘their’ board, with peeps who post other views about EUA then being constructed as ‘enemies’ of ‘their’ board.)

“… the enemies of this board …”

gotta say, i disagree with that phrase. this lse chatboard is open for anyone to discuss EUA as a company and its shares, irrespective of whether they are holders, shorters, have no position at all, are enthusiasts, sceptics, etc etc.

speaking just for myself, i have never been an ‘enemy’ of this chatboard (nor even of EUA itself), simply offering my honest views about the company’s prospects, and open to polite and on-topic discussion from holders, non-holders, etc.

Wilco, you do come across as a bit desperate. chillax fellah, it’s only money! - if the stress is too much for you to handle, take the old wise advice and sell it down to (your personal) sleeping point.

re sanctions, i think it’s relevant to note that sanctions are only about certain specific identified russkie individuals, i.e. those seen to have a particularly close and supportive association with the genocidal war criminal vladimir putin, and those actively engaged in supporting his illegal, savage and unprovoked war against a sovereign neighbour who posed no military threat to russia … (but which was showcasing to their russian neighbours that it’s much nicer not to live under putin’s yoke!).

… point being, there is no bar whatsoever in place to stop any russian, or BRICS other (or anyone else!) who wants to buy EUA’s assets, other than restrictions on specific war crime complicit individuals.

— so if there are any decent, law abiding russkie citizens who want to buy EUA’s assets, there is still nothing whatsoever stopping them from tabling a bid, just as there has been nothing whatsoever to prevent them from doing so for the last 6-7 years plus, during which EUA has utterly failed to sell any assets.

19:26, stretch, you naughty deramper you! — with posts like that, it’s wonder you aren’t being green-boxed by steadfast LTHs.

13:52, your previous post about winona had stirred some warm visions within me that i was frankly quite enjoying, but boy oh boy have you messed that up with this execrable image of beastyeti in scuba gear … i am struggling to get that out of my head - ugh.

Just as an additional reality check about likelihood and feasibility of any effective criminal action ever being pursued by official regulators etc, worthington was a *much* bigger game than ctag, and played with a main market listed share, but look how pathetic is the attempted prosecution to date of the people alleged to have run the wrn game:

https://www.compliancecorylated.com/news/epic-court-battles-weigh-on-uk-watchdogs-efforts-to-reduce-case-duration/

Interims should help monitor the ongoing cash burn.

No, it’s not a fact at all. it’s a much used anti-semitic trope.

so, are you pro-nazi or anti-nazi, johnny? … what do you think about the nazi’s views about jews?

(ps, why would you believe that it makes someone a nazi if one of their grandparents was a nazi?!)

Baffled why you claim that you filter people, stretch —- ? what is the point of filtering if you read the posts anyway?

… which post of mine on this thread are you objecting to this time round, stretch? - my 11:05?

17:57, johnny seems to be trying to knock merz by calling him a “nazi” … but the deleted post which johnny is complaining about was removed by lse admin because of its blatantly antisemitic content.

i’m a bit confused, johnnny, are you pro-nazi or anti-nazi? —- & what do you have against jews?

(and what do your posts have to do with EUA, as opposed to just providing you with a platform for bigoted ranting?)