Member Info for Spikeyj

13:20, looks like everyone’s leaving that question for stretch when he comes on later this evening — he’s great on those kind of technical issues.

Nice spot, thanks okenia.

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TD9Sw4DZxpo&list=RDTD9Sw4DZxpo&start_radio=1

? anyone got anything else they’d like to try?

? maybe mind money’s broker note is the research note that cs was referring to?

Maybe carlito is finally about to make his power play, now that stretch and the welcher have swung their voting bloc behind him.

Slightly tempted to sell a slice, but resisted the temptation, looking for £30 to take a piece off … probably not soon, sadly

Notice how part of the ramp is trying to pretend that mind money is in some way an investment bank. it’s not.

it’s an online bucket shop in limassol that tries to target russkie retail pis, the wilcovs and stretchovas of this world.

C/g, imv you are being very, very naive if you genuinely believe that there is anything ‘independent’ about mind money’s role here.

goodnight, all honest and polite folks.

I note that google’s ai mode does not agree with bella’s claim that mind money ‘reports’ to freedom finance europe.

it describes them as having some shared partial *history* re previous parent companies, but operating as distinct entities since 2021, now being separate and independent (i.e. from each other) brokerage services both based in cyprus.

i wonder who bella works for? … murky waters, caveat emptor and dyor…

“its [sic] time to buy some more as these bargain basement prices will not be here much longer”

lol, that from the guy who fibbed that he never gives advice about buying or selling!

… still, at least he put inverted commas around the word ‘independent’…

The term ‘rare earth elements’(/‘rare earth metals’ etc) is somewhat misleading, since they are *not* actually particularly rare.

… but they are very rarely found in deposits that are sufficiently concentrated to make commercial mining viable, and the necessary ore processing is very expensive and energy intensive,

there has never been any evidence whatsoever published by EUA to indicate that they have any even remotely viable deposits of rare earth elements.

…. as with the farcical numbers touted in that ACF report, it seems there is some rather fortuitous deniability for EUA itself that it is a ropey cypriot bucket shop trying to promote nonsense about rare earth metals via telegrammers, rather than any such claim coming officially from EUA in an RNS signed off by the nomad.

‘Rare earth elements’ …. liars.

Which might possibly give the share price a momentary lift, and then back down again.

Lol, that could hurt me feelings crypto …. since gecko’s post got erased, it looks like you mean me, [sad face emoji].

With some of these ‘in the ground valuations’ that get thrown around, it’s very obvious that peeps are trying not to acknowledge costs involved in digging stuff up ..,

… but it also looks like some peeps are trying to pretend that raw platinum can be valued just as though it’s pure platinum…

anyone looking at EUA valuation should try to understand terminology differences and cost implications re ‘platinum’ vs ‘pure platinum’ vs ‘natural platinum’ vs ‘raw platinum’ vs ‘raw platinum ore’.

15:11, yup, EUA is just a story stock, with little to zero genuine underlying value. so they continually have to keep finding new story angles — such as the dual listing supposedly to help that mysterious big ivan buy back in, lol, — to use to drum up more mug punter pi support, so get successive placings away and keep the BoD and their mates in pay and perks (…not to mention potential jollies from any unreported side missions around the times of each pump and placing).

Wilco, silly boy, no need for anyone else to pass on your message to mr_w…

.. if *you* filter someone on lse, *they* can still see all your posts (unless they are also filtering you.)

SB, b_positive clearly doesn’t really believe that this will go for “vast riches”, he simply wants to sucker others into buying the shares which he bought fairly recently as a short term trade that he’s got a bit stuck with.

… what they repeatedly try to play on is the memory that before the war, the share *price* here was a lot higher.

but price is not *value* — price is what someone pays, but value is what they get.

the share prices of companies like wirecard, enron, patisserie valerie, quindell, sirius, etc, etc, all used to be a lot higher.

but just because a company once had a massively overvalued share price doesn’t mean it will ever get back to such prices again.