Member Info for Spikeyj

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/ex-quindell-boss-loses-1m-on-broker-stake-rcdlppzf6 quob writes down daniel stewart share holding to zero value in their accounts.

"Sorry to keep mentioning the IP address thing and claims that LSE didn't know what their doing, but it was just another " off key rant" that explains you current psyche. :-)" you can mention it all you want. i and plenty of other posters recognise you are the same guy who used to post on lse as brotherhumble. no amount of wriggling changes that. whether that's because you are using a different IP address (not difficult to do), or whether lse admin for some reason have permitted you to have yet another go, i don't know.

"... I was (invited) to post on WRN as opposed to posting.." lol, brotherhumble. you wriggle when caught. meanwhile, remember yoshie invited you to post on NEW.

since your friend yoshie has asked you, & you seem very proud of it, perhaps it's about time that you post as he has asked over on the NEW board? (i've reposted a few comments of yours over there as a starter.) apols to the bb, off-topic for imtk.

onthemoney, i've already seen that yoshie asked you to contribute on NEW board, where it seems both you and he actually have an investment. but i have not seen any post from yoshie or anyone else inviting you to post on WRN. i don't know whether or someone asked you to via some other media. it's possible they did, & it's possible you are simply lying ... i can't see it matters. but the bit i found not plausible was the idea that anyone in their right mind would ask you to post on a bulletin board in order to take the 'heat' out of a discussion, or in order to add some rational common sense! ... your posting style would promote neither. the bit i think is simply hypocritical; you've previously been very scathing of people who post on boards they are not invested in, and you have said you have no time for it.... but that's exactly what you have started doing on WRN discussion board.

onthemoney: "Can't remember when I've discussed 88e for example or NEW, just haven't got the time mate." yes, it's odd that. since you have had the time to post about 14 times very recently on WRN, a share you seem to be saying you don't hold, when you've also said (onthemoney sept 10): "...I personally have no time to spend spouting on shares I do not own.." so wouldn't it be more consistent if you posted more on NEW board, where you claim to have quite a significant holding, rather than spout on about WRN, a share which you do not own? (unless there's not actually much that can be said about NEW?)

well, according to poster 'onthemoney' (who, oddly, posted this to WTG board on friday, rather than on NEW board): "The BigSofa/ New RTO project, if successfully completed has all the tools to propell the company to market leaders or near abouts within their two year forecast. Their business strategy is like night and day better compared to IMTK for reasons I've explained elsewhere. When the placing platform is released next to Cloudtag and Koovs this stock will represent my joint largest single stock outlay. [[ -- stuff re other companies -- ]] If investors look beyond the name and unscramble the marbles to conceptualise that they have utilised the highly academic and more importantly, technical video diogonotic/ analytics team and in effect have the business ability to provide all of the clients video requirements, including the much fought over streaming contents, which the big boys like, Sky, Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon, BBC etc are paying millions for. They have the ability to provide bespoke requirements which have already appealed to education authorities, banking industries, aerospace ....the list goes on, but it's no surprise that their client list is seriously A list. " that sounds marvellous, doesn't it? holders here will presumably be delighted if onthemoney's ramping turns out to be true. not long before more details emerge.

royjohn, check out the usual volumes on this share. except when qpe or qpt has been buying or selling, volume's usually tiny. gl.

... not, of course, an original idea, but still a good one. mr buffet: "Rule No. 1: Never Lose Money. Rule No. 2: Never Forget Rule No. 1."

"Still I suppose, if your not invested ...you can't lose. " yes, that's one of the key points. it's a very good thing to pick stocks that will go up, but it's also pretty important to me to try to stay out of shares that would lose me money. i post on lse boards about some shares that i don't own, & also i post about some that i do own. i see you are posting a fair bit on WRN board now -- is that a share that you hold?

cheers

o/t for tung, apols to others. i wondered if you had any comments you could offer regarding misys and its intended ipo (e.g. regarding paas?) any thoughts appreciated, and would of course not be treated as gospel/advice etc. ta.

am hoping that givetheinfo has psychic powers of telekinesis. all together, let's just think that sp a bit higher! heave!!!

i wonder who it was that cracked. most significant volume since july. somebody bailed.

(meant of course, "if it keeps on rising..") can see a little dilemma on my hands in october. i like legal, and am keen to keep a good stake as a longer term investment. but i will probably want to gather a decent chunk to put into the biffa IPO -- given this very nice legal recent rise, this may well be one of the ones where i take the chance of being out for 2-4 weeks to fund my biffa. (..but jumping the gun a little, since terms of that flotation are not yet announced...)

i have no particular 'analysis' of the adammark post i'd want to offer you. i don't know if he's who he says he is, but his claim seems plausible enough. he points out that IMTK still seems a long way off breaking even, let alone actually making money. it repeatedly has to keep raising money, & has not seemed to do well recently in drumming up enthusiasm for new money to come in at any good price (cf, the poor response to the recent open offer). they don't seem to be making many significant new customers or contract wins. and BoD salaries and overall expenses/cash burn seem to be high. i've also noted they've recently awarded themselves a load more extra free share options with no specific performance targets attached to them. all those things seem fairly self-evident, with or without adammark's post. & none of those things make this company seem a good investment to me. it's possible that there are some positives about this company that might counter-act these negative points. but i've no idea what they would be. i don't know much about the tech in this field generally, & i have made no attempt to research IMTK's particular tech position because this is not a share that I would consider investing in to begin with. i have no current interest putting money into loss-making AIM micro-caps atm. as i've said before, my interest in watching this share has related to RT's games, & is waning as RT has left. i guess many current IMTK holders, certainly amongst those who've bought in within the last year, are simply pis who followed RT's ramping into IMTK in the hope he would take it over. like i say, perhaps there are real positives about the company that i'm not aware of. if so, i would expect that people who have actually put money into this, like yourself, would be better placed to comment on IMTK's strengths. as with WTG, it seems rather odd to me that you are seem so very negative about IMTK, but still claim to be holding some IMTK shares. -- as most people who have a very negative view of a company and its prospects would get rid of their shares and put the money elsewhere. but no advice intended, up to you if you're happy to keep money in here.

"Do you think the many investors, many maybe with hundreds of thousands of pounds locked in her and probably very worried at the prospect of losing substantial funds and some even businesses are really worried about your game changing " fan club" reference. I'm totally astounded that someone who professes to be a shrewd investor could imagine that a reference to the word ' my' would eclipse adammark worrying post. Can you imagine how concerned posters are conceptualising your latest contribution ?" ... last one from me for this evening... - in answer to the above from you, i doubt that many people who are invested in IMTK pay any attention to this bb, so none of the posts here matter much.

[soz! my monday 08:32, not tues 08:27. .. how time flies by, when on holiday!]

".... then waited for the predictable " where you going Spike ..." no-one asked me, and i didn't say. you really are a strange poster.

.. as per my tuesday 08:27: " ... personally i don't much want to keep my eye on any short-term trading positions when i am having some downtime ...checking in occasionally still counts as entertainment in my book, but trying to trade in & out of intra-day peaks and troughs takes way too much attention when there's other hol stuff to do." clear enough even for you, surely? george had asked me if i bought any wtg on the dip, and i said no, because i don't want to be trying to do much in the way of short term trading while i am on holiday. that doesn't mean that i don't read bbs, & keep an eye on investments. i see you haven't offered any answer to the question i asked you: "who do you think you are posting for when you write "we', other than yourself, brotherhumble?"