Member Info for Spikeyj

Re 16:45 and 18:43, lenoman doesn’t seem to understand that the issue regarding attempted market abuse by making claims to have some kind of inside information do *not* depend on the ‘information’ in question being correct or not.

some market abuse involves deliberate use of genuine, accurate inside info, but some market abuse comes from attempted manipulation using false information — both potentially can attract significant jail time for those found guilty (up to seven years in prison, not ten, as per FCA warning displayed prominently across the LSE chatboards).

although as del has already highlighted, if someone has not attempted to commit market abuse, no reason whatsoever they should be bothered by anyone mentioned the jail time that can be involved.

(and yes, the FCA and others can and do monitor and request chatboard histories if relevant to significant investigations, as clearly happened with the WRN forum imo, and LSE will comply and release such info to relevant statutory /legal authorities)

Trendfriend, which provider do you believe allows any new short positions to be opened on EUA - do tell?

(… none at all so far as i’m aware, and no response from tilly who has mocked others for supposedly being CFD shorters.)

Rumplestiltskin?

Note, the latest update doesn’t say anyone’s actually about to get paid … it just talks about sending “notifications” — whoopee!!

… probably can’t buy many groceries down waitrose / lidl with a thick wad of ‘notifications’.

? tilly, so which provider do you believe allows CFD shorts on EUA? … or are you acknowledging that’s not happening?

Tillywhiz 12/6 08:01:

“Denby, chico

Ortex is factual, bozos

How’s the CFD short going?”

#memoryclinicsallround!

(…also puzzled why tilly would want to pretend he’s only trying to have a go at traders who use CFDs to go *long* on EUA, lol)

Curious, eh, why a specific date is given for the notifications to those holding sheets of toilet paper issued by the company, but no date at all is given for the contact to brokers, just “After…”

“.. he’s positive and provides factual information…”

loads of posts today, so i may have missed it, apols if so, but i didn’t see tilly (or indeed anyone), specify which provider still allows short CFDs on EUA.

tilly likes to claim that sceptics are shorters, as part of his rampy schtick, but I think that is not factual information, just smoke & mirrors b/s.

13:49, indeed, when s/prices fall, rampers like to say, for every sell there’s also a buyer.

but they don’t tend to reiterate the same idea, i.e. for every buy there’s a sell, when s/prices rise.

large volumes traded since the pump began… so who has been selling into that? - they may need to get a wriggle on, before liquidity dries up again.

13:16, i think the market’s questions are not so much about the (historic) results being bad per se, more doubts about strategy (going forward)?

… seems a bit overdone to me, so have added, small.

11:40, tbf i’d say nugatory, rather than utterly worthless, but perhaps i am being too upbeat.

jmo, de nada.

Part of the game being played by the rampers in this pump and dump is to conflate the notion of something being ‘published’ ( — on a restricted access site) versus something being **in the public domain**.

the detailed contents of the DFS are price-sensitive information, & are *not* in the public domain.

Kammy, it’s not “when” a sale happens, it’s “if”.-

(even EUA’s own RNSs admit that!)

Crypto 09:21, men, top men …

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x33qwb4

? … still nobody able to identify a specific provider who will currently permit short CFDs on EUA? odd, that.

Added, small.

Tilly banging on about shorts again.

? but is any provider allowing CFD shorts on EUA? … i don’t think so. (but happy of course to hear different if anyone can name a specific provider currently permitting that.)

23:12, lol! - post of the day (& it looks like there were plenty!)

10/6, 21:28, de nada!

… added, but only smallish. l/t view.

Ex-BHS directors must pay £18m over chain's collapse https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c722n81kkpxo

Nice to know that sometimes dodgy directors do face consequences.