Member Info for Spikeyj

1984, you appear to slipping back into insults rather than discuss the company. tsk-tsk.

… in your earlier post, were you trying to suggest that some “desperados” would deliberately ‘frustrate’ payments, and if so why would the? — or did i just misunderstand you?

Nope, pepsicle, you are incorrect.

for sure, if the identity of the supposed paying agent was disclosed, i would give it a quick google for a few seconds to check that they actually existed as a legitimate business. but i would have no interest at all in attempting any contact with them myself - why would I?

19:00, lol, a question about motives for posting from pikeyk —> who set up that ID specifically and solely to troll posters on the CTAG board who are sceptical about cloudtag, right around the same time that amit was ramping up those promises about mega-deals and payouts.

… pure trolling, solely on this share, and never any attempt to discuss, evidence or analyse the company itself, its supposed markets, products, etc etc.

If it helps to reassure you at all, if contact details of a paying agent are revealed, i would have zero intention of phoning them or emailing them … why would i?

come to that, why would anyone who wasn’t a shareholder?? — if ( - incredibly, imv -) , there were people out there sitting on large outstanding shorts, then what would be the point of any shorter phoning the agent??

1984, your original post at 12:04 appeared to be trying to suggest that someone (“the desperados”) would attempt to “frustrate efforts to pay”….

… that sounded like you were suggesting somebody would deliberately attempt to stop or slow payouts … so why would anyone want to do that? (? or did I just misunderstand what you meant, and by “desperados” you just meant shareholders?

If it was all real, why would it be a problem for shareholders to make contact with the agent??

1984, any answer to my 13:15?

Fantastic, shareholders are going to be paid with a weblink to a website where they can get more information about a payment process - cashier at Lidl won’t argue with that, as good as cash in hand, lol.

Think the strategy announcement was a just bit dull / damp squib, with unchallenging targets set and only small buy-back, content of ongoing poor sentiment.

but decent value here l/t in my view, and so have added again, smallish.

(mind you, every time i add small to my LGEN, , it then gets even smaller, sad lol)

14:04, he’s just a very naughty boy

14:20, perhaps there’s a teeny-weeny bit of that goes on from rampy folks, from time to time?

: )

? where’s that liar tillywhiz gone, the guy who mocks other for supposedly being CFD shorters then pretends he didn’t post that? … he often does seem to go AWOL when s/p falls.

The slight snag, llywelyn, is not about who is permitted/able to buy russian assets, it’s more that EUA’s assets are just pants, were pants long before putin’s recent burst of bloodlust, and will still be pants long after putin accidentally falls from a very high window several times in a row.

Sharebel is one of the more reliable reverse indicators on the lse chatboards.

? - if, miraculously, cloudtag’s deals etc are all genuine, deals fully completed, money ready to go, etc, etc, then why on earth would anyone want to try to “frustrate efforts to pay”? — what would be the point?

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0at_WtxLt4

… but in a way, there’s probably a little bit of CTC in all of us …

you gotta search for the ctc inside of yourself, etc…

(or willshak, lucien, or jub capital, or spartacus, or winnfrith, etc, etc. — hard to keep track of all the people folks here have told me i am)

No, i am CTC!

Offler, it’s not “new lows” - he’s repeating rac ist abuse against another poster that he’s already posted on several other occasions. regrettably, lse admin appear to allow him to keep repeating it despite previous reporting of the same terms.