Member Info for Spikeyj

Rare earth minerals are compounds containing rare earth elements.

platinum and palladium are not rare earth elements.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare-earth_element

Stretch, EUA does not own rare earth minerals.

15:20, gecko, “US/Ukraine/Russia (EUA) rare earths to the rescue”

that is deliberate dishonesty from gecko this time round, since it’s already been highlighted to him more than once that there is zero evidence that EUA has any commercially meaningful amounts of rare earth minerals. (sure, russia does, but EUA doesn’t.)

(…but if anyone can provide independently verifiable evidence that EUA has significant rare earth assets, please do feel free to share for the whole board to see … tia!)

Gazza, which jurisdiction do you have in mind with those extracts you posted? — where is cloudtag domiciled (if at all, lol!)? —- and how do those various statements apply to ctag, as a private unlisted company that is certainly *not* registered in the UK?

? what would be the point? — the shares are all completely worthless.

… more about trump’s comments about imposing ‘major tariffs’ on european pharmaceuticals…

? why does a company that does not do anything need an extra board member?

LOL.

Or, putting it the other way round, it’s not like anyone posting on here is preventing EUA from selling any of its assets, operating its mine, activating a sinosteel funding package, publishing a DFS, selling its sandpile, gaining a second listing, explaining where the 26p placing money went (and repatriating it back into EUA shareholder funds…), paying a humungous dividend to its shareholders, or even providing an accurate, detailed and honest update to the market about what the heck is going on.

if the EUA BoD was able to do any of that stuff, and willing to do it, there’s nothing any posts on this chatboard could do to stop the company.

… so one wonders (a) why EUA ain’t doing those things, and (b) why some of the rampers on here get so het up about sceptical posts.

21:15, lol, in charge of what? … it’s just a chatboard, nothing more.

(i mean, it’s not like anyone posting on here is actually making EUA do anything, mine anything, or sell anything, is it?)

the glory days of that massive, systematically organised share price ramp sucking in unwary pis to the heights of 40p are long gone. gecko, datttttttta & co just got left holding the babies, long after mac/aberdeenman left.

Brenda, i note that the rampers were unable to respond to your 10:43. … presumably rather too factual/on-topic for their taste.

Crypto, i think it’s simply because there isn’t much sensible that gecko or his fellow enthusiasts can say about EUA itself.

that just leaves them with random share price predictions, pro-putin/trump/fascist propaganda, personal abuse against other posters, and (as happened this morning) entirely spurious attempts to pretend that EUA has valuable amounts of rare earth minerals.

[11.01, soz, shoulda said rare earth mins, ]

… more about the false claims about rare metals, rather than how the s/p flickers…

Tbf, brenda, EUA’s metals must be pretty rare since the company can’t find ‘em.

09:20, twistedcogs “… having US institutions invested in equity of Eurasia…”

vs

08:05, B_positive “placing churned”.

09:20, twistedcogs “… having US institutions invested in equity of Eurasia…”

vs

08:05, B_positive “placing churned”.

21:16, spot on.

whether one is pro-gecko or pro-spikey ( - neither position seems particularly sensible to me, c’mon folks, just make up your own minds! - ) surely peeps could agree that is unutterably dull when gecko clutters up the chatboard with endless posts, week after week, stating that i have something to do with jub capital??

even if someone is dim-witted enough to believe him, how on earth does it enhance anyone’s experience of the chatboard to read gecko repeating the exact same accusation over and over, day in, day out?

i do try to stay fairly polite with gecko most of the time, but fcs, gecko’s unremitting belligerent stupidity on this chatboard really is quite bizarre. (thank goodness for the rest of lse that he doesn’t seem to own any other shares, at least it spares them.)

B_Positive “Recent high was 9p.”

lse’s website shows the 52 week high as 7.75p.

18:14, to the contrary, gecko, i have confirmed to you that i am *not* ‘jub’, nor have i been ‘jubbed’.

Mr_w, surely, there’s nothing particularly “big man” about repetitive personally abusive spam on an anonymous internet message board, is there?