Member Info for specinvestor99

Oops it should read

"I can not seem to find any prices." referencing to swarms of dykes.

DYOR but it RRR may have a monopoly on mining these.

I wonder why it took years for RRAL's elite exploration team to find this 'dyke swarm'? These types of geological features must be harder to find than: hills, rivers, streams, lakes, mounds, valleys etc

No matter. The important think is that RRAL has swarms. Now its just a matter of getting the word out

Stop worrying about no mining equipment to BF to mine gold and have positive cash flow now that RRR has SWARMS.(caps added for emphasis)

LOL

IMO its great that RRR that has these.

How much are they worth? I can seem to find any prices.

I should added that in GC's apology letter that the amount was referred to as "significant' not substantial as stated in this forum

Maybe be a bit picky but I have been waiting 2+ years for 'imminent" to happen, almost a year watching Lithium exports, and learning the ship carrying BF equipment never really left because 2 people got sick.

Nike-- GC paid RRR yes I have seen various internet reference to GC paying RRR as well as "substantial'

Since it does not appear in RRR financial statements then I suspect the following: 1) the amount was not actually paid to RRR but rather paid by GC directly to a charity and/or 2) the amount was not 'substantial' in relationship to RRR it might have been to GC but the amount most likely would have been around 1,000 pound +/- or some such amount and all parties agreed to call it 'substantial' to discourage others from that sort of activity

RRR's objective was not collect 'substantial' amounts or to send money to charity but to stop GC's activity

IMO the phrase 'substantial' is misleading in context to RRR's financial statements

Re: "G.C paid out a substantial amount to RRR and it was donated to an AFrican charity"

What year did RRR receive this money? I believe it was around 2013 I looked carefully over years of RRR audited financial statements but I dont see it.

If RRR was damaged and received a substantial amount of money for those damages why was it simply given away. I am not questioning if the charity needed the funds or is doing good work but I am trying to understand the following:

1-Substantial amount- this is vague and opinions vary as to what substantial means.

2-Charitable donations- given the history of RRR's losses and the damages that RRR suffered what was the corporate rational to give away funds (even if for a good cause)

Nike you are correct RRAL reference 20,000 Australian dollars with RRR being responsible for all costs about that

Could be a coincidence but this is the monthly amount referenced that RRAL needs

Banbury you are totally wrong. success is measure by letters written, meetings held & NDA's signed

RRR is in a 'good place' debt is being added with the support of 'major shareholders'

RNS stated "Given the tempo of activity during the holiday season across the Company's activities, "

Since I dont live in the UK what Holiday's are or did occur?

I know a number of people in the UK and I did not wish any of them "Happy Holidays" Hopefully I did not completely miss them.

I can certainly understand why plans can be delayed for Holiday's which were not planned for. In Canada we have them marked on Calendars and such things. I am surprised that UK does not do something similiar

As a loyal RRR shareholder once someone tells me the Holiday then I can mark it on my calendar and send RRR a reminder so they can take into account this Holiday Season in future planning. Others can join in this effort

Positive news

-more meetings planed

-NDA is now plural so more than one

-ship carrying equipment is delayed because 2 key people got sick. probably ship's captain and navigator

-better than expected DRC results-most likely everyone has agreed to more meetings and send more letters back & forth

-shareholder support to pay the $250,000 has been demonstrated by not actually paying the cost by getting an extension to pay

These are the results that RRR that I expected and just as I predicted todays's share price is up

-

be

Nike I only posted reference to analyst report. I made no comment about their methodology or its validity.

Wallet is forecasting a drop of RRR's share of about 60% in 12 months. IMO if BF fissles out, nothing happens with RRAL or DRC cash is not received Then IMO RRR price could be lower.

One analysts is forecasting a price of 6p an increase of 120X. Even if DRC cash comes, a deal on RRAL is done, BF equipment arrives and gold production of say 1,000 per month gets going I have hard time think that price is achievable.

Which one of the price predictions is more realistic? Newton's law says an object in move stays in motion unless it acted upon. Will there be such an event for RRR's share price? I hope so but history says otherwise.

Good night. While I am concerned for RRR it appears you are not so congratulations to you for your outlook

Nike- Wallet being unreliable analyst

Compared to who?

Clear Capital Sept 2022 current price .38 said target price 1.35

1st Equities Jan 2023 price .26 target 2.8

The list goes on see https://www.rrrplc.com/investors/shareholder-information/broker-research/

I value all opinions and analysts, even those who have a negative outlook on the shares of a company that I own.

News -lots of words and although you did not explicitly state that you disagree I believe that was your intent.

Again what is your definition of 'analyst'. Is it your position that you can bestow the description as you deem appropriate?

Although you may disagree with the analysis (for any number of reasons) but they clearly state that they performed that activity and therefore meet the Oxford definition. I chose Oxford believing it would be acceptable in the UK,

I am open to alternative suggestions

It speaks for itself "At Walletinvestor.com we predict future values with technical analysis for wide selection of stocks like Red Rock Resources."

definition of analyst from Oxford Languages "a person who conducts analysis"

What is your definition of analyst?

See https://walletinvestor.com/lse-stock-forecast/rrr-stock-prediction

Current Price

▲0.0475 GBX

forecast

1-Year Forecast *

▼0.00172 GBX

Please post price updates on Antimony which is yet another metal that RRR does not produce

Fortunately RRR does not have spend any money (which they dont have) when value is create by writing letters, having meetings and signing NDA's.

The market will one day wake up and see how undervalued this company is.

RRR needs another brokerage report taking into account all these factors

Please help me. I can not find the RRR's RNS where it has received the DRC award money.

Is this only available to see in the UK?

This is great news!!!

RRR has 'potential' production from:

BF

Kenya

Ivory Coast

Australia

etc

Actual production none

Valuations Nice to see licenses being valued at $2 million. RRR was also valued by a broker report-Unfortunately it was not even close to the real market perception.

NDA's, meetings and letter (rappel's) are nice. No doubt it makes people feel good that something positive has happened,.

Given the lack of market movement on these 'significant' developments. Perhaps RRR needs to have more meetings, write more letter and sign more NDA. To save time and reduce travel costs just meet people on the street, have blank NDA's ready for people to sign. The announce that RRR had 15 meetings, signed 9 NDA's and follow up with everyone by writing 9+ letters.

That should get the market's attention.

This is certainly an interesting strategy but flawed.

I have the following items for sale:

-buggy whips

-corded phones

etc everyone gets the idea

IMO meeting are nice but I really want to learn about tangible progress such as

-BF equipment was it sent?arrived? not sent?

-DRC getting new government people up to speed is good. A letter was written which is also good.

What is the next step and when?

RRAL- NDA signed with interested party--That's good. What is the next step and when. RRR has had other groups sign NDA on a variety of properties and then nothing actually happened.