Member Info for specinvestor99

See https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/monthly-insolvency-statistics-january-2024

DYOR

Gold price is higher, billionaires are getting into gold. Too bad RRR is not producing gold.

Is the RRAL deal dead?

Was it paid?

Was the BF equipment delivered?

Has AB left DRC empty handed (again)?

News you posted a question " I am sure an RNS will be issued but I am not in charge am I? "

Answer The board is anonymous so I dont know if you are in charge or not. Are you really Andrew Bell? Is Andrew Bell really in charge? Or AB answer to someone else? A group of creditors perhaps?

Even if an answer is provided there is no way verify the answer. So an answer is not needed

You have not offended me in any manner

I am responsible for my own happiness. Nothing posted in this forum will impact any of my emotions

I welcome all views. I like reading views that are contrary to my own

Posters come or go based on their own for any number of reasons. All of which are unknown to me.

You can post or not post, go or dont go. All up to you

I only found it interesting that you posted that you invest in companies with tier one or close to tier assets but chose not identify any RRR property that would have such a potential thus it would appear that you are not a RRR shareholder

IMO no one has to be a RRR shareholder to post here

News Yes people post here.

You posted that no one should post unless they own RRR shares yet by your stated investment guidelines you would not invest without a tier one asset or the potential for one. Does have RRR have one in your opinion? Yes I am interested in your opinion. if no then by your stated posting standards then you should not post here.

There is nothing wrong in owning RRR for speculative reasons but IMO any discussion of tier one assets is not relevant.

Yes I believe that if someone invests in RRR (or any other stock) it is useful to know what that company's objectives are, which IMO can be determined by reading what the company writes and listening to what they say. If those objectives can not be determined then what is the company trying to achieve? And if a company does not know what their objectives are then what is success?

I know why i invested in RRR and have shared that on numerous occasions and it is not for a tier one asset

News That is non response response.

From your reading, review, analysis etc what do you believe is RRR's objectives? Any potential tier 1 assets?

I have expressed my opinion based on the available information. What are your opinions?

You make comments about tier one assets but do you believe that it is relevant to RRR?

you posted this statement re tier 1 "I dont tend to invest in any non potential Tier 1 or very close to Tier 1 by a smidgen"

So based on that comment you would not invest in RRR yet (I believe) you have stated that you have invested or are a shareholder in RRR. Particularly given your views on Non RRR shareholders posting

here is a excerpt from your post

"---------So, NON-SHAREHOLDERS ON RRR FORUM HAVE £0 IN RRR-------------

So, why post from morning to night? Doesnt make sense?"

To be clear I am not suggesting you post from morning to night. Personally I dont care when or often someone posts

News Thank you for the response. Please expand upon this comment you made "This is not a potential Tier 1 asset worth billions" which was made in reference to BF.

1-Tier 1 definition " A Tier One Gold Asset is an asset with a reserve potential to deliver a minimum 10-year life, annual production of at least 500,000 ounces of gold and total cash costs per ounce over the mine life that are in the lower half of the industry cost curve."

2 What if any of RRR's properties has this potential? IMO none based on the currently available information

3- Is a tier 1 asset a realistic objective for RRR at this stage? IMO no. IMO RRR can be very successful company producing 100,000 oz of gold (or 1/5 of the 500,000).

4-Is it RRR's objective to get a tier 1 property? IMO not from their actions. Along the same vein of thought, what are RRR's objectives for the next 1-3 months? next 6-9 months? or even longer term.

My view is that RRR's objectives are/were: A-get DRC cash B-put BF into production and C-do a deal on RRAL

None of those 3 relate to getting a tier 1 asset. IMO any combination of those 3 stated RRR objectives would be transformational

News That was a non responsive response. I will repeat the question perhaps with a bit more specificity

What do you not comment on the negative aspects of RRR? Are you not concerned with BF equipment not arriving as scheduled? Are you not concerned with the large amounts of RRR shares being issued over the past 2 years? Are you not concerned with no information being released after 2 weeks in DRC for a 'finalization meeting' which certainly had implied that it would be fast?

As a side point I would also point out that even non shareholders can express an opinion. Perhaps their comments will provide insight as to why they are not shareholders. After all if everyone were already shareholders who would be left to buy shares?

Life is not fair.

If I post the following facts (as in not reported)

1-BF equipment has not arrived

2-DRC cash has not arrived

3-RRR has a lot of debt

4-RRR has issued a lot of shares in the past 3 years

I agree that those are not negative observations however some facts are negative. The positives for RRR are all

'what if's' or future events. As in

A-What if the DRC cash arrives

B- What if the BF equipment arrives and what if BF produces gold

C-What if a great deal is done on RRAL

Are the 'what if's' more or less than the current factual situation? Most posters discuss both however there are two posters who only discuss the 'what if's'. Most posters acknowledge that RRR has problems/issues some do not.

Why not? please respond

Banbury

Well said. Both are unrealistic pumpers who have no accountability for the previously posted BF production estimates other than 'merely an estimate' or some such rubbish. Posts about other properties (as in oh look what they have and RRR is so close we could have it too). Ignoring that has RRR no cash. What work is planned like sending equipment to BF and then not happening due to 2 people being sick is simply not commented upon.

If AB is still in the DRC this would be week 2 for a 'finalization meeting' so did anything happen or did AB leave DRC empty handed?

To all re Nike At the recommendation of LSE I have filtered Nike and will no longer responded. I need to ignore the personal attacks.

good fortune to all the longs

Nike it was a rhetorical quote which was made with nuance and subtleties to elicit a response.

You need to lighten up on the personal attacks against me. I have posts 2;34 and 417 removed.

I have recommended (perhaps similar to your one endorsement )two posts made by News

Sad to deny reality. But it is what it is

News- re "no emotion' this personal observation of you was made by Nike who based on his observation must have personal knowledge. If not then Nike should retract his statement. I should note that Nike has frequently posted in support of your positions, so you might want to take that into consideration.

I wish you luck in your job search as well as future health & help regarding the mental condition described by Nike.

DRC finalization meeting-So is DRC meeting over? did it even happen?

Yes I understand 'meetings' are happening. As they should. RRR announced BF equipment had been shipped and was scheduled to arrive in early July. But 3 months later it is big news that they are having a "meeting". IMO a planning meeting should have BEFORE making an announcement that equipment was being sent and when it would arrive

Is this good management? Anyone can respond to this question. It is not rhetorical

News

You can try any number of explanations so far its been I am too old, JP Morgan is only in the USA and now no one on this forum in a position get anyone a job a JP Morgan. I agree with your latest version that no one can get you a job at JP whether on this forum or any number of possibilities. Someone must possess the necessary qualifications as well as a number of other requirements,

To be clear you asked for a job referral to which I said: "No". As evidenced by your posts you even did not know that JP Morgan has a very large presence in the UK. Shocking!! and you wanted to work there

News re JP Morgan

First I have no personal knowledge of where you live or where you would like to live.

Secondly on JP Morgan information from the Internet

"JPMorgan Chase is an American multinational banking corporation with a large presence in the United Kingdom. The corporation's European subsidiaries J.P. Morgan Europe Limited, J.P. Morgan International Bank Limited and J.P. Morgan Securities plc are headquartered in London."

So it is possible to work at JP Morgan and live in the UK. It might also be possible for remote as well.

The reference to the medical condition relates to the inability to feel, express or identify emotions. The reference was made in response to Nike stating you had no feelings/emotions. As mentioned in my response to Nike I do not believe he knows what you feel but you will have to deal with Nike on why he made that statement

X post by AB

Me

@nickyboy1886

·

6h

@RRR_RedRock

@StockBoxMedia

@ABell2019

Burkina Faso, what’s going on?

Shareholders were told gold was coming? I’m hoping we’ve not been “rain made” …

Equipment was en route …

"Andrew_Bell2019

@ABell2019

·

4h

Ouagadougou, the team last night

Image

Andrew_Bell2019

@ABell2019

Meeting ended shortly before 2 am. Negotiations with a third party (off camera) adjourned after 8 hours, to resume today. Every detail matters, so every detail gets attention."

Long meeting demonstrate that is not a simple matter of RRR getting $, something else is happening

Interesting choice of words with particularly attention to word 'was' which is past tense.

If had actually arrived AB would have (IMO) have stated that instead it is past tense. This is consistent if prior disclosure -2 people got sick and equipment was on route (meaning it is no longer being sent

Given the DRC picture it is a very long 'finalization' process. Obviously there is an issue or issues which need to be resolved amongst the parties. perhaps fatal flaws