Member Info for Soupdragon78

ok Wacca, you don't like the sp performance, you don't like the communications from the management, you don't like the brokers report....

remind me, what you do like and why you're here?

Exactly Chab, nobody can argue with the fact that the sp performance has been dire.

I think the Oxilio side of things is dependant on Oxilio's own funding round. The licensing can't be closed out until that is resolved and monies available.

Wacca, so touchy.... calm down dear.

You said they should come out and tell us something good or bad, they fact they have done this and have a 34 page note to back it up is probably too much for your tiny brain.

What are you wanting them to come out and tell us?

Well done you.

As always sellers appear to have more ammunition than buyers.

Whimax you are missing the basic fact the FX is talking about current directors not ex-directors.

Poor old Offshore, he's still banging on about Kissei after all this time.

Wonder when Gooding and Higgins will pull their fingers out and issue their TR1s they are required to do so.
Even without buying or selling they were due to do so weeks ago.

yeah FX, I was meaning those who buy and sell with a timescale of hours

At the moment it doesn't feel like the shareholders have the best interests of the company in mind.

Good to see Karl Keegan is finally busy with something to do at ETX after they have received milestones from Galapagos for work on.... oh... ermmmm.... IPF and Fibrosis.

Surely nothing conflicting there. Maybe he can pass Anne's business card on to them.

To be fair some of them have held for more than an hour so they'll be expecting 3%

All gone quiet, guess its Friday afternoon squeeky bum time for the traders, do they risk selling up or not?

That’s data direct from Vox markets and in turn whoever Vox buy their data from, NFX can’t change it.
Go to the investors info page which is correct.

Hi Older, it might be possible to figure that out. But would take quite a bit of time.

I have a script which highlights trades of the same qunatity, so I can easily pair off corresponding trades (e.g. I can see this mornings sell of 609,376 has a corresponding buy yesterday at 8.37am)

If I deduct the corresponding trades then I'm left with all the others that are either buys or sells, but its impossible to know whether they are buy different individuals (i.e. There may be a 100k buy and two 50k sells, but we won't know if the two 50k's were the sells of the 100k that was bought as there's no way of connecting them)

Older, my 183m figure is my own from records of the printed trades since 7 April. So includes printed buys and sells and is cumulative.

It makes sense to work this way, i.e. if there is a buy for 10 shares and a sell for 5 shares, then the volume is 15, not 5.

It would be quite an effort to work through and cancel out corresponding buys and sells.

We are now on 183.6m shares traded since the 7th April, equivalent to 31% of the company

So another large volume day with little change in the sp.

Interestingly the 5m+ trade just gone through exactly matches another one from 10.30 this morning in both price and quantity.

That last 719k trade is symptomatic of the current situation. Its was someone who bought and held for an hour, then sold at a loss!