RE: Lanstead20 Jan 2022 14:05
Mars, its in Lansteads interest to see the sp higher as part of their subscription. Here's my thinking (bear with me if its teaching your gran to suck eggs).
Using just the first part as an example. NFX created 22m shares at 1.5p which they give to Lanstead, who then sell them across 4 months and give the proceeds to NFX. So this 22m at 1.5p has a value of £330,000 which is pledged to the company.
The base price for NFX is 2p, if this is met they get 100% of the money due. Above or below they then adjust accordingly.
So, working with the following valuations.
If the sp is 2p for the duration (to make the maths easier than a fluctuating sp), bang on the base valuation, so NFX are due 100%.
Lanstead sell 5.5m shares at 2p each month to cover the money going to NFX, netting £110k each month or £440k in total.
They then pay NFX 4 equal payments of £82,500 (£330k/4).
So with this base of 2p, Lanstead net a profit of £110k. (£440k deducting £330k to NFX)
If the sp is 3p then....
Lanstead sell at 3p netting £165k each month or £660k in total.
As the sp is 50% above the base price, they owe NFX 150%. So £82,500 add 50% = £123,750
So with the 3p, Lanstead net a profit of £165k (£660k deduct £495k to NFX)
Then with sp of a low of 1p.....
Lanstead sell at 1p netting £55,000 each month or £220k in total.
As the sp is 50% below the base price, they owe NFX £41,250
So at 1p Lanstead net a profit of only £55k (£220k deduct £165k to NFX)
In conclusion if the sp is at 3p, then Lanstead make 3 times the profit they would do at 1p share price.