RE: Major Client1 Aug 2019 22:57
The identity is not really all that relevant imo.
Call me mad but I actually think the $4mil still may come (or a good portion of it), why do i think this? well JP is no mug and my suspicion is he knows the clients situation, clearly he cant say anything but there is a relaxed, patient/trusting demour from him towards the client. Its like he knows its not their fault, just conjecture, but its not straight foward as they wont pay. My guess is he knows it will be fulfilled at some point just not when.
Why if you are going to default on the contract would you sign a letter of intent, effectively duplicating your promise should this go to litigation therby strengthening SMLs case.
GL all, blue tomorrow please.