RE: Key Dates27 Sep 2020 14:38
slarti_bartfast,
Yes, the risks are not increasing. I'd say that the risks have been well managed by Tullow so far this year. Costs have been cut, and the business has been streamlined, etc. So Tullow is in a better position than last year/earlier in the year.
My comment regarding "riskier" is to do with the RBL re-determinations and the Uganda sale. Each day that passes adds a level of risk and/or uncertainty to it not completing before the RBL re-determination I suppose.
Regarding Kenya, from my understanding (as in just my thoughts/opinions): They will be reviewing the FEED and re-designing to incorporate the entirety of resources available to the fields.
Currently, Kenya is split into several stages. The FID that was planned for this year (to be updated) was for a foundation phase utilising 210 mmboe resources with incremental development to the field to increase resources in later years up to the total 2C resources available (560 mmboe resources).
As I understand it following the Interim Results, Tullow will be skipping the foundation phase and going for a full 560mmboe+ resource from the start.
Luckily, contracts for tenders weren't awarded yet for the project, so costs will be minimised.
Best way to look at it would be like.. thinking of Snickers' bars at Sainsburys :')
A 48g single bar of Snickers costs 65p = 1.35p/g
Whereas an 83.4g Snickers Duo bar costs 85p = 1.02p/g
Apply similar concept to Kenya and you reduce the cost per barrel significantly at slightly increased CAPEX/Development costs.
As with all projects, costs of the project can be minimised in the feasibility and design stages. Go past the design stage and you will find that costs rack up significantly due to changes in contracts, materials, planning etc.
Capital Markets Day should be interesting!
ALL IMO.
Slift