Member Info for Skippysb01

However. I do think it has done what it was intended to do. One thing to post it then have to take it down. Quite another to post it and then find outs it's just a stick of Blackpool rock.

I think they know what they have.

Lets face it. They should not have posted that pic. Reckon they were advised/told to take it down.

Even assuming that the RNS is exceptionally good it does not change the very real fact that the gains experienced over the previous week were so good that the SP this morning begged to be sold to realise profit. Nobody can guess exactly what will happen going forwards but profit is profit and the moment an AIM share like this gets interesting there is an army of traders waiting in line to buy and sell on that.

Even though the RNS this morning was very encouraging it did not confirm the commercials essential to turning the assets into profit. Why did they not include this if it is going to be part of Wednesdays presentation? If the big news is still weeks or months away - why invest today? We could invest tomorrow.

Even if market cap ends up being may multiples of todays in the next year there will still be days like this. Me - I bought in here too high and I bought some more at 18p to reduce my average. I'm hopeful.

Doesn’t that depend how tight the ship is? I appreciate that leaks do happen but it’s not the default that it’s always obviously the case. I think truth is that the regulatory process is frustrating for shareholders because we don’t like waiting for lab results. The pic from Friday probably should not happen but it has precedent based on how mining discovery companies have used pics to keep the market interested while we wait previoisly.

It has caused the SP to increase 20% so if it's not what it obviously is meant to represent it would quite clearly be market manipulation. To be frank they should not have done it anyway. Glad they did.

They can check what the mineralisation/metl content is on site but they cannot publish results of that unless it is supported by assay results from a lab.

That picture today - if it is not gold then WSBN will need to be taken to task by the regulator. I think they know what it is.

This is the equivalent of an oil company showing a picture of a bucket of dark brown sticky stuff and then later revealing it was treacle. Prison time. Can't see it myself.

No. A few months ago they shared pictures of visible mineralisation and the pictures looked less conclusive albeit quite shiny. This latest photo looks to be of a core containing gold nuggets.

Now if they published that photo and it isn't gold then they should be in trouble for that. I think they know what they have.

I was thinking that if they showed that pic and it wasn't gold they could get into a lot of trouble. So surely it must be gold.

Nuggets.

It's an odd one for sure. So either TB is taking advantage of his position to move his Autins risk into BRH rather than hold it personally - that would be somewhat cynical to say the least. Or BRH really do believe that Autins will find a market - it does look like a 'recovery' stock.

I have no idea. They have a nice website. It's a company that does well or not on the strength of the contracts it wins. Certainly a global recovery would mean it has a bigger market.

Legalwolf. I agree. The overall market is not in a happy place. There are so many angles to that. If you had some cash over the last few weeks would you have put it into a highly speculative AIM investment or just rinse a FTSE100 stock for an inevitable return. e.g. does anyone think that L&G won't get back to it's 12 month average after the 'mini budget' fall. Also some tasty dividends to be had. Some dull investments looked quite attractive.... you almost need to see the market in a settled place to make AIM look attractive.

Shows the importance of looking across the market. I'm not sure there is anything wrong with WSBN at all but set against a darker background it isn't getting the focus it night.

WSBN will have it day mind you.

It's quite the claim that an insider of the company is having conversations about providing project updates with investors.

On ramping and de ramping. Every AIM message board is the same. I prefer to positively engage because I can't see the point of investing in something I don't have any confidence in. There are many ways to show that and it's not just ramping.

I have previously suggested that we would get a rise in anticipation of assay results. Well we will if there is any anticipation. Ive tried to work out what a sensible expectation is in terms of when we will get them and have come to the conclusion that I haven't got the foggiest. Perhaps the market hasn't got the foggiest either. It's a risk for me because I don't necessarily want to take all of the my shares through to a potential discovery outcome - because the assay results might not be good enough. Some anticipation is a good thing for an AIM SP. I would suggest that successful AIM investors (not many of them!) know that the bigger wins, certainly more frequent wins, are down to anticipation rather than actual results.

So this makes me look like a ramper and a de ramper - with an agenda. In fact I'm just being a bit open about my strategy and what I want to do to increase my chances of getting a profit. I base this on experience where previously I might have been more emotional about a company and left things too long and gone from a profitable position to a loss in moments.

But what do you mean though? WSBN is drilling and sending cores off for analysis. So have ECR. The only difference if you assume there is value in the ground is that ECR has been drilling longer and has more data?

Actually I popped over to the ECR board earlier to see if they had an idea of how long it had taken for the lab to turn around todays results. Not clear as ECR didnt notify when they were sent. Probably different lab in any case.

I think it's fair to have a guess at when and what will happen. Nobody has all the answers.

You are doing the same. No? If we get a rise tomorrow or in December you will be wrong. Market does agree with you - it's not going to be now. Either that or the market just doesn't believe in WSBN.

Now I'm stirring it I think - it will be this week. I can feel it in my water and there was a couple of magpies on the roof this morning. Must be true. ;)

That was down to one trade of one share at the bottom of the spread. You aren't doing yourself any favours by posting something like this on the basis of absolutely nothing happened. SP remains within the trading range it has done for months.

Trade reporting a bit odd today. That 150k is showing as 450k on the Google chart and likewise the 12.5k noted by 1daymaybe is showing as 595k on Google. I thought the higher values probably explained the lift in spread this morning. Google may just be wrong of course.

I don't usually watch trades like this. Just felt the larger trades seemed material enough to keep an eye on the rest of the day. Still needs more volume.

446k buy at 8.4p. Let's hope its not the only one.

Erm nope. I believe i even wrote something like this on this board way way back during the hight of the pandemic. Vaccination reduces transmission by reducing your likelihood of developing the virus and by reducing transmissible symptoms if you get it anyway. Never never never was it claimed that being vaccination 'stopped' transmission. All vaccinations are risk mitigation not 100% solutions. We could go on but what's the point.

I knew this so everyone else did or could if they chose to pay attention.

One video does not an argument solve.

When they get lab results they have to RNS. No holding on or waiting for more.

Open question requiring lots of patience is when. I think some time between now and end October it's more than 50% likely we will get a view of what's in them rocks.

Well it’s true that I will sell some assuming the SP rises ahead of drill results. Lessons learned. I’ll still have enough in for results but profit is profit.

Nowhere near that right now. But I do believe we will have a drill in Q1.

Well I wrote 'some certainty'. Nothing is guaranteed. But I see less reasons now to think we won't drill.

There is another angle here for me. If this company had never drilled I might see things differently. But as clumsy as it might seem - they did get a drill done before so they can do it and with the drill availability resolved it feels like logistically it's just very likely now. I think they have struggled to resolve the lessons learned from the first drill - need more capable drill and it wasn't easy to find one - so they showed some inexperience there. But with a drill 'in hand' they will get to it.