Member Info for SirGBoycott

If the PPA / SML and FC are not here within a year then KIBO will not be in Tanzania.

Agree AGM is just a date, LC will want to have certain things ticked off by then ideally but the AGM date isnt or want set in anticipation of all things being completed. The SML will have been submitted by then whether its approved and PPA agreed is a different matter.

The process not within KIBO's control is approval. They are ready to consider the application once the final two parts are submitted.

No mention of PPA in update.
Explicit statement that it could be expanded to 1000mW.
Remaining components submitted within 2 weeks.
Race on to see whether Botswana can beat TG with their approval.

Still here.
Lahtojoki samples are in Canada. Upto three months.

Not bad for just a few newspaper clippings eh

Yaki, how much input do you think KIBO / LC had into the 'Local Content Plan' format etc and is ours already done?

As was explained to myself and Yaki the TG have changed the mining legislation but haven't full defined / communicated the process to all involved in it (officials and applicants). First applications through are guibea pigs in some respects.

Is it Friday already .......... careful Boff you'll clog the board up.

Seriously though if the TG govt continues to procrastinate and the others take a more leading role it will cost them a lot more when they come crawling back to the table.

That's your quota of posts today wimbo please
Reckon I must be close to the limit too
Could be looking at an update at KAT shortly by looks of things

Mike has made a good and fair point. No-one knows a what point the format for the submission was changed. Given the content hasn't changed (as per the RNS) it cant have taken too long to put it into a different template and then review. Its been done now. Move on.

Not every CEO / Company on AIM is going to be successful. Some will fail because they make the wrong decisions and choices others will fail due to circumstances.

Leave off BB ... your the exact opposite so why don't you leave it out for a bit. Anyone who remotely shows any enthusiasm or trust in LC is immediately tagged by yourself as being odd / a ramper or one of a multiple alias.

If you don't like it filter it.

Could buy it for half the price.

Why take it private and why do companies traditionally de-list? Usually because they are debt ridden or struggling to raise finance? Serious question for debate. Just because you have 75% doesn't mean you have to de-list does it. What purpose would it serve to take it private and what benefit would there be in leaving it as it is?

Could easily have got to 75% in the last month if he wanted to.

Not a bale out. Increase in shares due to placing reduces holders percentage but he may also have sold a few as well. Still holds 4%

Lets be clear he didn't knowingly submit them in the wrong format but yes he could have informed investors at the time and I expect may have taken advice from the Nomad to that effect. He cant go round publicly accusing the govt of dragging their feet either. The doubt is hardly killing the shareprice at present ... its stagnant yes.

Perhaps you could me a few pointers Lol........ the point was more the level of information released to shareholders. Unless you are in a Lenigas share then the level of detail / updates on AIM stocks (esp the smaller ones) is / has been minimal in my experience but perhaps I just pick the wrong ones?

BB - "The reformatted IBFS was resubmitted to TANESCO today and the final commercial discussions on the PPA are expected to conclude expeditiously following submission of the reformatted IBFS"

8 working days ago. Seems clear enough to me. Plus you knew all this 'dishonesty' when you decided to leap back in and want the mis-leader in chief to make you a few quid? I am sure we would all like to know a lot more of what is going on day to day / week to week but its not reality TV. I am in and have been in other AIM shares where the level of detail / update is even less.

We have yet to learn swifty what you know about investing. Clearly its a lot more than anyone else here but its good that you clearly feel this share that you are commenting or is worth your attention. All you have done is point out the obvious missed timescales and ridicule a number of people. Have you met any of these people? Is the press not a legitimate source of research / background or should anything published be ignored. Are people not free to be positive about an investment they hold and share there thoughts and research? As for not selling at 7p and buying at 4.5p I imagine very large holder on here wishes they had done that but by definition they would be trading the share and not investing in the company for the long haul. How people manage their investment / portfolio or trading strategy is up to them.

Based on information to hand and in RNS statements I dont think it unreasonable to have expected news at the times you state. You can then argue that LC is either lying or misleading people or the fault for delays lies at the feet of the Tanz Govt. People are free to choose and make their own minds up and state what they believe on a bulletin board AND have that view challenged.

As for abusing other posters as you called in the past. Check your own posting history as its clear your quite happy to call people out yourself. You might be right in some cases but don't come over the holier than thou on here.

You have yet to offer one piece of useful advice. You might think the same of me ... fine. You clearly have an issue with several people being positive about their investment then filter them. Personally, I have a lot of time for people that go to AGMs, meet the BoD and share there thoughts online ... poeple are free to make of that info what they will. I am not going to spend my day arguing / discussing this with you as we are clearly going to disagree. Good luck to you in what ever you hold.

Come on then Krispy make it two out two .... whens the next one going to be

No I think Krispy just reads the RNS