Member Info for Silversprings

Oilspartan - yes it’s been a quiet period from the company but the tie up with F1 can’t be ignored, all NFTs sold out before they were even on sale. Even just that one relationship could be huge for a company this size but when you factor in the other partnerships as well it’s very promising.

Guzzler you’ve long held this tactic of trying to intimidate anyone on this board who has any positivity towards the company at all. Most of the stuff you write is just complete paranoid nonsense getting bent out of shape about stuff that either hasn’t happened or you’ve taken completely out of context. As others have said many times in the past you just need to calm down.

Accusing every single supportive poster of being a City multi
Ranting and raving at anyone who dares challenge anything you’ve written calling them rats
You’ve accused me of being Epstein before
Demanding proof of the outcome of future events that haven’t happened yet
Bashing the BOD for failures that haven’t even materialised yet

It’s a sad attempt to make the BB an echo chamber for you and your acolytes to just pedal a load of paranoid negative nonsense completely unopposed.

Glad you are scaling out guzzler as you don’t seem to have the temperament for long term investing. You seem extremely aggressive and disingenuous.

If you don’t have any faith in the company Guzzler just sell up. Every day you’re choosing to leave your pounds in MOS you’re effectively saying you think it’s the best vehicle to get your money back. If the BOD are a load of liars and the company won’t make any revenue targets then just take your money out. Why do you remain invested in a company and BOD you clearly despise.

Guzzler - he’s not put a timeframe on it there has he? The roll out of the drops is just starting, who’s to say there won’t be that sort of number over a multi year contract? Again, you’re catastrophising a worst case scenario in the future and asking people to disprove it or it must be true. You’re just going to have to wait and see. Maybe there will be 100s, maybe there won’t, but no one can say after a few months.

Guzzler - you probably need something a bit better than ‘it’s along the lines of’ before you pile in on something he’s said. Context is everything. You also can’t accuse me of ignoring something when I’ve watched the podcast you asked me to, couldn’t find it, asked for evidence, and you’ve made it my problem that it’s not materialised? I’m not the one trying to denigrate the CEO for something he said, you are, so maybe have the evidence to hand next time.

Guzzler I did listen to the podcast on 25th November with Zac Mir. He doesn’t even mention any target number of drops?

So again, can you please provide verbatim what Epstein said about 100s of Pumas drops?

As for waiting for results? Unlike you I don’t like making up numbers .

Guzzler you said there’d been another statement from Epstein about 100s of Pumas drops yesterday. Where is it?

Or are you talking about any original statement he made? If so what exactly did he say verbatim?

Guzzler sounds like you’ll be selling up then if it’s a lifestyle company?

Where’s this new statement from Epstein, I can’t find anything from him today.

Sophie, I agree with you on it being a positive.

If the company was in complete disarray, revenues looking poor, cash position dicey, contracts stalled and poor performance on current contracts, then why would any director want to take share options exercisable at triple the share price over cash? They all must be positive about the direction the company is going in.

Guzzler - there’s 9 live drops at the moment. You have no idea how each one of them is going. None. No one does because that’s insider information.

As systemic says the costs then need to be factored in. We have no idea what they are.

You are simply going around catastriphising about worse case possible scenarios and then maintaining that they must be true unless anyone can prove you wrong which of course is impossible without access to insider information. Very very disingenuous.

Guzzler you have absolutely no idea what the revenues are for this quarter. You can’t just say they’re poor unless someone can prove otherwise. It’s like someone coming on here and posting ‘revenues have quadrupled for this quarter prove me wrong’. You have no idea on the timeframes for revenue for new contracts based only on the Cadiz example. MOS sold out the F1 NFTs days after the announcement of the arrangement by MOS.

You go around accusing everyone on here of peddling false info then just make stuff up yourself

Amtech - I agree with you, it would be good to know more about that. I’ll take anything that’s said on a bulletin board with a pinch of salt until it’s confirmed in a set of results. Unfortunately we may never get the full breakdown of each individual drop. Perhaps there has been lessons learned from the sale of the first GL drop and the best way of selling these but that’s just an assumption it’s not been confirmed. For all we know there may only have been one drop, we will have to wait for further communication from the company.

Just let results do the talking is actually the only thing that can occur. RNS announcements from the organisation, comms from the BOD, audited results; these are the only things investors can hang their hats on rather than speculation (positive or negative) on a bulletin board on a daily basis.

No one on here knows the true revenues or costs, no one knows the status of certain contracts or deals. It’s insider information, so investors can either accept this or just keep shouting into the void about how many Gaby Lopez passes have been sold today. No one is going to answer.

Amtech - those potentially ramping are in very low number, there’s barely any positive posters left on here now. I don’t see many people posting speculative figure share prices or speculative revenue numbers.

If you genuinely hold shares in MOS I can see no logical reason why you’d spend every day detracting from the company, it’s strategic direction, the BOD, and indeed anyone who holds a positive opinion on it. What is the purpose? There is none. Surely at some point you would just sell your shares if you had no faith in the BoD or the company’s proposition. It leaves the only possible scenario that makes any sort of logical sense to explain some people’s behaviour on here is that they have shorted the stock and are therefore interested in destroying any sentiment they possibly can on here whilst the company is at the infancy of its growth. There’s no other explanation for it.

We’ve seen people making up that the market place was a bug ridden beta concept (it was launched the next day), that there’d be no NFT deals, ‘MOS will never sell an NFT’, they’re just pictures like a digital panini sticker book, glorified ticket master, alive entertainment isn’t a real company etc etc. just fabrication after fabrication and negative conjecture based on no real information. It’s not a normal or logical point of view to just make up the worst case possible scenario about a company and then say ‘well unless you can prove me wrong I’m right’ which is effectively the behaviour that most of this board has descended into.

Toffee, Sophie - it really does come back to the age old adage of investors with patience waiting for results from the company. All these demands for knowing the exact revenues and constant on a day by day basis is a requirement no serious company would ever meet. Some have tried to see sales on the polygon blockchain but to get the full picture there really is no substitute for just waiting for the audited results from the company. The last set we saw that revenue had increased due to the NFT concept starting up, it’s now expanded massively since then so will be really interesting to see what the next set of results say. Everything in between is just guzzler and his shorting crew screaming into the abyss as no one can be bothered responding to him anymore.

This is great news. Sold out before even being available for general sale on Heroes NFT.

JusticePillar - it’s great having another positive poster and supporter of the company on the BB. It might be worth providing more details to any claims you make though otherwise it just looks like ramping and will be fuel for the shorting crew on here to go off on one. You seemed to think an announcement was imminent the other day, why the delay?

Guzzler you and your shorting crew just want a forum where no positive view of the company is allowed. Unfortunately for you there’s more and more on here now who are seeing what is being built here and the inconsistency of your nonsense deramping

Guzzler - whereas you always present a very balanced view of the company you claim to be invested in?