RE: More posts than trades23 Feb 2023 11:18
City - there’s a lot of people who appreciate your posts but perhaps gave up arguing with the low quality trolling that had sadly infected this board. Would be a shame if you stopped providing the insight you do for those who appreciate it.
As for those who are implying Itacon is the same person, that just shows how ill informed and short term your ‘research’ is. Anyone with a memory longer than 6 months will remember Itacon furiously arguing a negative perspective almost daily on this board (often against City). That was until he then joined a Telegram Q&A with Epstein and then changed his opinion on the company. The aspersion that these are the same people is probably the most embarrassing attempt at trolling on here I’ve ever seen.
As for my own opinion on where we are, we know from the last set of results that revenues are stable underpinned by Livescores and the IGS contract. Indeed they had grown by over 200% year on year in the last revenue update (pre NFT campaign) if I remember correctly.
In my mind it then becomes a question of whether you believe the NFT strategy is the correct one for increasing stakeholder value. Like any small cap share though, if you had assurances to every possible risk and concern you had then there wouldn’t be any investment opportunity to pursue. Go and put your money in Apple or BP and the like if you want those assurances. Far too much of the detraction is linked to the current share price and moaning that none of us have a crystal ball.
There are no sure things but you can only invest in what you believe are good companies with good opportunities ahead. If the risk profile is too much for you then everyone has the choice to point their pounds elsewhere. For me the size of the opportunity here is brilliant, even at 0.5p I thought it was. Small companies often reach tipping points in their growth journeys after which their results can be exponential.
To come back to where this started about short memories, I remember only a few months ago this board filled with posts about how they couldn’t see anything related to NFTs, it was pie in the sky, no product, the platform was bug ridden and a Beta concept, they couldn’t compete against larger players, there’d never be a single NFT produced by MOS etc. In only a few months this has all been completely and utterly disproven in what has been a remarkable market incursion case study yet the same detractors are now just rotating onto whatever negative they can next see ‘but Mark said 30 deals and we’ve only done 7’.
Just have a think about that, 7 individual different contracts with top end institutions, all within a few months of starting the NFT proposition, all with a small cap organisation in the face of huge competition from major players established in the industry. What further proof do you need that MOS’s USP is compelling and working? ‘But ME said 30’ - some people need to grow up if you genuinely think this was realistic within a few m
Sign In
Follow the stocks
