Member Info for Silversprings

Guzzler - a bunch of amateurs who have just signed an exclusivity deal with Latin America’s biggest crypto financial services company.

Systemic - MOS is a listed company, they are obligated to show you commercial numbers at least once a year. The company is currently reporting every 6 months.

Ticking up today

Jemgee - did you read the part of the RNS that said ‘there will be no costs to MOS’. The deal is based on a revenue share which implies revenue will be made.

This deal massively de-risks MOS

I’m not sure how many other ways the words joint venture can be spelt out without it actually being said.

Exclusivity deal, revenue share, joint product lines, access to respective customer bases, cross promotions. It can’t be spelt out any more than this regardless of what the market says in the short term.

A multibillion pound company now has a vested interest in the success of MOS. PR/marketing, scalability, access to SME resources, access to market data, do you think any of these are going to be a problem for MOS now?

The Bitso deal refutes a lot of the criticisms against the company.

MOS will run out of cash - Bitso will have done due diligence on MOS as a going concern, clearly not true.

The NFT proposition is dying - why would a multi billion pound company want to make a deal with a proposition that doesn’t work?

No one is buying the NFTs - Bitso will have seen sales figures and projections and wanted in on it.

MOS won’t make any revenue - Why would Bitso sign up to a revenue share if nothing is being created?

The BOD of MOS are amateurs - just signed an exclusivity deal with a multi billion pound company

It’s an absolute complete and utter rebuttal to the shorting crew on here (which has been met with either silence, denial, or anger so far) . I’m sure their research, due diligence, and business acumen is better than a multi billion pound company’s though.

Toffee - in the interest of fairness it would be good to know what your confidence on a future news event is based on. I think JP referenced it as well.

Whilst Guzzler’s ridiculous repetitive negativity is unhelpful, any accusations of unnecessary ramping need to be disproven also either by admission of opinion or evidence to support claims.

Exactly CeriNedd, so why don’t people just wait for concrete results from the company rather than catastrophising worse case scenarios and asking people to disprove them?

Guzzler I shouldn’t have to tell you this that investing in micro caps is high risk. Every single investor here knows that. There’s no way to derisk that situation. If an investor can’t handle that then move their money to a FTSE 100 company and you might make or lose 2% in a year.

The alternative to results is speculation. That’s the reality. You want people to speculate so you can then ask them for evidence and call them a tamper when they can’t provide it. No one can. So you then take the alternative approach which is predicting the worse possible case scenario and then asking people to disprove it or it’s de facto the truth.

There’s sadly no alternative but to wait for results.

Guzzler - it’s not about turning a blind eye. You can wait for these really useful things called results. Then you don’t need to guess. How would anyone know how many NFTs have been sold to date? How would anyone know how much cost has gone into each drop? We don’t.

So again, either ask the BOD (which you won’t, and they probably wouldn’t answer anyway) or wait for results, or if you’re not happy with the direction of the company then sell up.

Trashing your investment on an hourly basis and stifling any positive case for MOS whatsoever is just illogical and nonsensical. Why put your cash in a company when you don’t believe in the strategic direction and you hate the BOD and can’t see a single positive? Makes no sense whatsoever, unless you’re shorting it.

Lothbury - I agree, the ‘boom soon’ round the corner stuff is equally unhelpful. They should back up those assertions with evidence of why they think that.

That’s not what Guzzler spends all his time asking though is it? It’s just a constant repetition of wanting to know revenues per contract, revenues per drop, revenues per product line, what revenue targets are, when these revenues will be hit, what costs are, what forecast costs are.

Without audited results, how is any PI on a bulletin board supposed to know these things? Yet he keeps asking over and over again until everyone just eventually loses interest and discussion on the pros and cons of the share is stifled (which is his only aim). Guzzler knows full well these questions can’t be answered by any PI and if one ever did he’d be the first to accuse them of having insider information and misleading PIs.

The lack of comms from the company recently has been disappointing, as had the delay in Cadiz drops, I’d have hoped for more traction on EFC drops as well, but each investor has to decide if they believe the company is still a good investment or not. If it’s not then just sell up, but trashing your own investment hourly on a bulletin board achieves what?

You know full well Guzzler that there’s different methods of invoicing and selling now which means the full sales figures are not just accessible from the polygon scanner. This has been explained to you numerous times.

Well the only options available to you are to wait until results, ask the company, or continue to a cream into the abyss on here. I wonder which one you’ll go for.

When will you learn Guzzler to ask these questions to the company?

No one on here knows because that would be inside information.

If you want to know how many NFTs have been sold go and ask the company but I bet you won’t because then you wouldn’t be able to spam this board with constant repetition of the same questions. No one will answer them.

Nothing triggers Guzzler as much as City reappearing on these boards.

Chief shorter desperate for his echo chamber of negativity.

Apologies Guzzler, must have been one of your shorting crew. Or maybe it was your multi Justice Pillar? Funny how City had to leave the BB for getting caught out but you got to stay on. Weird how that works isn’t it.

Guzzler - I thought you (or one of your shorting crew) had said MOS had lost the Gaby contract? That just a completely inaccurate negative aspersion to further your agenda? You’re as bad as the rampers you keep calling out.

Amtech - guzzler (and anyone on this board) is irrelevant to the SP. In my view the market hasn’t credited the work that has been done on the change in strategic direction of the company. It’s waiting for evidence that it’s the right course of action to take (as we all are). That’s why I think it will only be the revenue figures that shift the dial in advance of any future buy out. All the market has formally seen so far is the end of year results which showed 1.1 mill revenue which only included the first 3 months of the NFT proposition and a few drops. If the company can release figures to show hugely increased revenues as a result of the NFT drops then we will hopefully see an upwards movement. That’s all just my opinion.

Sophie - this BB has been months of Guzzler and his shorting crew shouting into the void they created by boring/intimidating most positive posters off the BB. Most of them sensibly followed the view that he should just be ignored but this has resulted in the positive case for MOS being lost on here and Guzzler et al being allowed to pedal paranoid nonsense based around hypothetical worst case scenarios that haven’t even happened as ‘facts’. Effectively it’s been ‘let me paint the worst possible case scenario for you that might happen and if you can’t disprove it then it’s a fact’. An utterly ridiculous approach to take to reasonable debate about the company.

Not everything is perfect with MOS, all small caps carry a lot of risk, but the positive case for this share has been completely lost in the incessant noise (which is of course what the shorting crew want). Positive posters like yourself Sophie need to keep fighting the good fight no matter how much grief Guzzler gives you.

So these directors running the organisation as a lifestyle company are declining the chance to take cash out and instead will only take reward if the SP triples from where it is now

Very odd way to run a lifestyle company

Amtech - why would the BOD take share options if they had no chance of ever cashing them in? That’s the one thing the shorting crew can’t explain. If the BOD are running it as a lifestyle company, then why did they turn down cash remuneration for share options if they knew that the company wasn’t performing well and they wouldn’t see the reward?

That RNS has absolutely pulled the rug from under the shorters on here and is probably why there’s a far more aggressive paranoid tone from them in recent days.