RE: Power of the Message2 Oct 2018 18:59
In May we had the Vanadium 101 webinar for which we were led to believe that as well as private investors participating there were a number of USA based entities on the call. The share price closed at 24.10.
I don't think anyone here would question the ability of our CEO and indeed Mikhail to engage with the investment community. Mikhail in particular I have a lot of admiration for, he is full of confidence and a seemingly encyclopaedic knowledge of the sector. Fortune has come on leaps and bounds in interviews continually growing in confidence.
Following that webinar designed to proactively engage with the investment community, by 23rd May the share price was 19.10. There were only two RNS between these dates, one was a warrant exercise of 7,598,684 shares and the second "Lemur Concludes Concession Agreement with the Government of Madagascar for the Imaloto Power Project".
The former despite being only 7.5m shares then gave an excuse for the MM's to drop the price by 2p over the following week. When the Lemur announcement hit, we were permitted a very temporary bounce back to 21.5 before being walked down again over the following week to the mid 18's, despite no negative news whatsoever.
At other times we have seen literally millions of buys with zero price appreciation, yet a few thousand shares sold is suddenly enough to drop us by a penny.
Or let's take the strike action. Immediately we were dropped by 4p. Not seemingly because anyone genuinely took an active decision to press sell but because MM's desperately needed an excuse to trigger low stop losses to obtain shares. PI's then bought and quickly recovered this. Then the announcement that the strike action was continuing. Another 4p drop. When the strike was over, lots of buying, did the price immediately rise by 4p? No, we were back to only where we were before the strike action despite one of the best pieces of news in recent history, the Sojitz buyout.
Although I can agree with what you are saying in terms of company engagement and the share price, there is clearly a massive gap between investors on other exchanges and those on AIM and indeed how those shares are allowed to move. Are Largo and Prophecy subject to the same market games that we have to endure on an ongoing basis?
The point of this is that I don't think it is necessarily all about sentiment following an interview. The question is whether a market is allowed to function within the normal boundaries of buying and selling without the continual smoke and mirrors of AIM. Throughout BMN history the merest rumour of bad news is immediately followed by a drop yet high quality positive news is largely ignored with any rise only allowed as part of a trend that takes several months.