Member Info for Si_Derman

Shipbuiling? What here? Not sure, mate, TBH. Hang on, I'll just ask.
Anyone here know anything about ship building? Yeah, shipbuilding, y' know building ships.
Why? Some bloke was askin'. That's wot I said.
Nah, sorry mate, don't think we do that at the minute, sorry.
But check back later as we keep changing what we actually do here, so you never know.
;)

There's a donkey here missing it's hind legs. Anyone here know anything about it? ;)

dcfn, nope. Just adding. :)

Already sold the sink.
I have this pot left. But I pee in that.

Thanks for posting a breakdown of the details, Chris.
Why are these type things always squirreled away on Linkedin and Twitter, where not everyone either looks or has access?
If not RNSable at least stick on the company website.

Thanks for posting Ted. Was reading down the additional quotes from stakeholders looking for, Cathal Friel CEO of Open Orphan said, "watch this space". ;)

What can you expect from someone that buys their shares six at a time. lol

No, it certainly is not. lol
Was thinking more of Westward Ho!, Northam and Appledore.

It was more about the skill share for H&W's already paid staff.
"Commitment by Navantia to provide technology and know-how transfer to Harland & Wolff, including upskilling of the workforce, with Harland & Wolff's employees receiving training and acquiring new skills in Navantia's shipyards."

Over recent years they have been building estates like on any scrap of land in the area that they can get their hands on.

I'm flattered that he read my post regarding Navantia. lol
But, after over twelve months since the signing , and he is still "looking forward" to working with them. That doesn't sound like there has been much going on with regards to any of the elabourate spin in that "Teaming"RNS that I mentioned.
Well, nothing that I can find.

That last sentence was a nod towards PV panels. Less conspicuous than the big wurly things. :)

I see The East has covered some of what I wanted add but thought I'd post this anyway.
It's a post I was penning this morning before I had to rush out. Was looking for somewhere to guage the heights of surrounding land at the time so cut and pasted it till I could finish it later. It's now later. :)
Acerage wise, it would appear they have plenty of land for such a use. But, imo, there would be too many factors that would go against such a proposal. Firstly, which parts of the unused land, ie. not buildings, quays and car parks, would actually be suitable given the topography. The yard is on the leeward side of the surrounding hills to the prevailing winds and obviously is down at sea level. Not massive hills, approx 50m at most, according to this map.
https://en-gb.topographic-map.com/maps/iu/United-Kingdom/
But turbines would need to be of a size to comfortably clear them to be effective. Also the proximity to the village, that relies predominantly on tourism, plus any immediate neighbouring residences might also be an issue.
The area boarders ANOB's and a SSSI at Northam Burrows. So if they were of a size to make them of any use would be quite visable to all of the above. There are quite a number of existing turbines across the estuary on hills surrounding Barnstaple but these are outside of the ANOB, I believe.
What they do have, though, is some quite nice south facing roof space above the dry dock building, and others.

Infa's response as published today in a follow-up article.
https://www.marinelink.com/news/infrastrata-responds-triumph-subsea-488918
Wondering if they a response to the response. lol

Thanks for the update, btw, OT. Shame they are looking so far afeild with a shipyard so close at hand.

Could that financing programme mentioned in the trading update, in regards to cruise work, be extended to ship building?

We spoke of this in the ealry part of last month as Appledore buit it's predecessor.
https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareChat.asp?ShareTicker=INFA&share=Infrastrata&page=6

Found this.
Tenure and Terms.
The property is held freehold and is available with vacant possession on a new lease on terms to be agreed.
Not sure what was agreed though.
I will ask, "someone who may know", wink, wink. If I see them tomorrow.

Yeah, I know you have. Just messing about. :)
Here's the original bumpf from the agent selling it.

https://property.jll.co.uk/sale-industrial-and-logistics/industrial-and-logistics-sale-bideford-ex39-1uz-15418

I know the site quite well as I used to get bulk sand from there in the past. You may be aware it's kind of split in two with the old sand yard in betwen the main Bidna yard where the dry dock is, and the Newquay and slipway.
Think this has got some outlines of the boundaries on.
Enjoy.

Happy to help, OT. :)
But don't make a habit of it and do your own bloody research. lol

That was back in JW's honeymoon period, OT. A time of setting and meeting milestones. :)
Although the bit that says," in addition to the 8 already planned and approved for the Project."
Yeah, that "approved" bit didn't turn out to mean to same thing as was first thought.
It changed a bit though, during that peroid and It ended up being 7, in two phases. 2 then 5. Then it was all in one go.
See 9th of May, 19 RNS.
"It may be that InfraStrata is able to secure an offtake deal for all seven caverns (phase 1 &2) rather than just the two caverns originally planned for in phase 1. If this is the case, FID (final investment decision) for phase 2 (five caverns) may be advanced by approximately 12 months from Q4 2020 to Q4 2019, with the knock-on effect of this that FID for phase 1 is delayed by six months to end 2019 due to phases 1 and 2 being addressed together. "

I've got details of 5 parcels of land being purchases totaling around £554k but not sure if that was one them , tbh