Member Info for shuvlin

Not sure evryone is in fear Lytham. You might get a very false impression from this board but on the other hand I can't see how this can go and stay much lower. GL.

Papaki, why don't you wait until we see the circular to reveal your preferences?

A bit of common sense from LUFC.

Lytham, I don't think the so called"bulls" on here are typical of the general investor population easpecially inasmuch as they either never have been bulls or changed their stance a long time ago. The board is already a cess pit. I hope you haven't arrived to take a $*1+ in it.

They are not all weak gotreal, there are several with an agenda that the weak ones all too easily start to believe. Even when the circular arrives we will still have the same nonsence as the majority of people cannot read effectively and will certainly struggle with a complex paper once again allowing the neer-do -wells to sow their doubts and create confusion.

More and more headless chickens on here. The comments are becoming less and less related to the reality that they are not only guessing about but imagining the worst.

!!!

I'm sure Slaters man will have run the numbers already Actuaryboi. I can't see it getting to this stage otherwise. I'm also sure that we will get them before the vote and a meeting .

"The profits that chrome and pgms could generate in the next 2 years is worth the 90m" I keep seeing that bandied about but do peiple mean Net Profits (PAT) because I can't see that happening. Too many loose definitions being used.

Not always and not completely. They have their own reputations to think about you rude piece of kr£p.

Thanks Seis will do.

No cap! bludy h3ll!

Directors talk (no space) missing

insert www . (followed by) *************interviews (then followed by) . com

shard capital view very positive. https://www.***************************/jubilee-metals-reports-strong-fy2025-output-as-focus-shifts-to-copper-shard-capital/4121208498

To a casual observer, not an impartial one( if you can even put yourself into their footsteps). It still boils down to wait and see and how much profit (net) we are making in SA compared to possible profit (proven to date) in Zambia. Any other figures provided here are speculation as there are too many unknown unknowns!

The figures don't lie everlong no matter what the motivation. Do you have a counter argument that is useful? I'm sure if we only had the PGM business we would be trying very hard to increase our supply but at what cost. As Leon said we would be in the territory of buying and operating mines. Is that acceptable to you or is it better to put our resources into copper and get more bangs for the buck (if it is working)?

Chartopper, perhaps it's because investors can see we are not just selling the PGM business because it's in a parlous state and there really is still more to be gained by moving over to copper. Quite honestly I havent a clue but it can only be a good sign that the sp is rising. Long may it continue.

Why would an executive FD tied to Slater go along with it Chatmandu? You are throwing straw men into the equation .

Rather have it invested. If it's any good we should be getting real dividends within two years.