RE: Further....20 Jan 2021 14:16
Bricks this is partly why I'm wondering if they're revisiting the zone explored by 018, 019, 020 (see Dec 18 RNS flagged by Trade yesterday). In the 2018 drilling results RNS which revealed the reportable copper the RNS also says this: "Drilling strategy to remove ‘gaps’ within the known resource, all within 300 metres of topographic surface, and to identify geotechnical characteristics of a possible decline/entry route(s) for preliminary years of mining", sound familiar? That's why I'm theorising that they could be going back into the same area in which the copper looked so exciting 2 years ago. So yes they want to improve the Pb, Zn, Ag economics of the early years mining but perhaps they are quietly interested in whether we can finally get a copper credit as well?