Member Info for Shedulike

"Copper is a sex god at the moment", CHRI5P each to their own..... :) . Only joking I know what you're getting at, phenomenal increase in value. I have asked LR about these drills in relation to possible copper (see T18, 19 & 20) and have been blanked, see 10BT eat your heart out! I have been thinking a lot today about sentiment and it is certainly hurting us but at the same time creating an incredible opportunity, the mcap is an utter farce. I'm really happy where we're positioned and just praying funds become available from another part of my portfolio before we get a valuation based on proven, marketable reserves.

Well done, a little in there to work with, perhaps I underestimated you Gam. Funnily enough I don't disagree that even a successful drill campaign might not be enough to move the SP significantly. History as you say doesn't bode well. As I've said before I'm completely in agreement with negative posters that the problem is funding. It's all very well to talk about non-dilutive options but shareholders and prospective investors who have been hit by placing after placing want to see evidence. You mention the "Same old story" and that's where I would disagree in that the PFS is the biggy, that's where our options really open up but I think the Exec's should be reassuring us and the market generally that we can get there as we're left guessing if the £2m, plus EU grant gets us there.

No thought not.... Intriguing that investors often have a pop at positive posters when things aren't going well. In this case it's as if I'm getting the blame for their investment underperforming. As it happens I reckon I talk about the risks more than most but why would someone blame a 'net' positive poster for their investment doing badly? Kind of suggests they're not taking ownership of the problem and I wonder if their research consisted only of reading comments on bulletin boards?

Highly cerebral as ever Mr Gam, you never have anything to actually say do you? Tell us what you think about the operations, what you think would constitute a good result with these drills, ore sorting, metallurgy perhaps. Do you think our new stakeholder engagement appointment is interesting or not? If you think the market cap will never get any better and all the stuff I (and many others) talk about will come to nothing explain why.

It's hardly got a mention today on its own board things are so bad mfm :) I just think morale is so low that holders can't appreciate the good things that are happening. We're in the middle of a drill campaign with clear value adding objectives and you get comments suggesting nothing is happening. Okay I accept that at some point this has to translate into value for us or what's the point? I strongly believe it will, but I'm resigned to the pain lasting a while longer yet. Unless something comes out of nowhere we're a bit predictable with the cyclical news flow of drill, assays, mets though the big difference this time is there will be a PFS on the end of it.

Actually forget NCYT it has come such a long way I'd hate it if anyone bought in and it crashed. I just think the market still doesn't quite get that testing will be around for a lot longer yet but they do need to plan for life beyond Covid. Still a good policy to get some stocks in other sectors though, so I'll recommend that course of action without naming a specific equity. Looks like it's battling with XTR for who's going to have the worse day anyway!

As we're all cross ramping :) if you want some relief from explorers with no income I don't think it's too late to get into NCYT where the money is just flooding in (having a soft day as well). That's one reason why I don't object to off-topic as I owe Lloydy for bringing this to my attention last year (where is Lloydy? XTR like everyone else probably). We never mention our duffers do we? Haha something you will never hear on a bulletin board, "I sold my holding here and put it into XYZ and you know what, it has absolutely bombed".

10bt talking about irony you wanted me to pass on an insult to LR so I'd get off your high horse if I were you. Anyway Bricks has been given the nod to pass on LR's number to you so can make your feelings known in person now.

If that's how you feel then I would follow your conviction Grappa. I'm happy with progress here but I can't deny it's failing to attract fresh interest. I've pulled out of stocks before at a loss and it is hard to do but if you are convinced this isn't going to work out I suspect you'll feel better about life straight away.

Why don't you ask on the XTR board Grappa? I don't particularly object to 'off-topic' but it would seem a more likely place to find XTR investors.

Not sure how anyone could want Pavel back. Let's wait for the verdict of the trial but as things stand there is a possibility he had his hand in the till. IF money was misappropriated from Pokrovsky then who knows how else that culture effected the rest of the business? Should he be cleared in court, plus the forensic review turns up nothing damming then as a Founder I wouldn't object to him being back on the board.

Flippin heck I agree with DtheG! While I don't want to go overboard we do owe a degree of debt to the management teams and workers beneath the Executive battles for keeping this going. There have been Covid cases but procedures have prevented break outs in camp. With so many workers living in isolated accommodation on site, avoiding any shutdowns is an achievement.

If I'd known this time last year that CV would be a world pandemic plus the corporate upheavals I would have taken a steady year. It appears the impact of not getting the Pioneer flotation up and running last year was bigger than expected but the third party ore is proving a model that is coming online Q2. I assume the capital expenditure has largely been made as it was CV supply chain disruption that delayed it until after this winter. The market will start looking forward in due course.

CHRI5P I think all LTH's are disgruntled and have every right to be, we just seem to be divided into those who still believe a positive result is possible and those who don't. There was a time when I would confidently say that what is said on here makes not a jot of difference to the SP but recently I really can't explain the utter insanity of certain inflated valuations compared to the situation with EUZ. When you look at the number of posts and trades at companies like EUA and GGP it must impact the SP, any dip and you instantly get a flood of posts re. 'topping up' etc. Of course there will be a judgement day for these companies (coming soon at EUA) and we'll see if the hype is justified, with the PGM story very possible. GGP however has a mcap on a par with many established gold producers with proven measured reserves, explain that to me. I reckon that without the 'herd effect' the market verdict on EUZ would likely be around 0.25 x NPV which would be somewhere around TP's discounted valuation, and oddly ZM's charting target :)

trade really appreciate your digging but the Halifax piece is just a news article to populate their share dealing news section not an endorsement of EUZ. For me the research and educational work is massively important in terms of proving that we are in concord with the jurisdiction, that's essential if the project is to be realised. I have asked if the drill deviation research can be monetised and had a vague response which I'll take as a no for now.

I think most holders would accept we're not going to drift up to 30p on nothing. As a holder and believer I think we're worth 30p at least but I just can't see us moving to 30p on chart technicals or whatever the term is. If they report promising cores or perhaps further funding news then perhaps we would move to a new range but unless the chart has foreseen great news I don't see how the existing chart can indicate a move to 30p. I don't doubt that Zak Mir is a shrewd fella but 'analysing' our chart without reference to what we actually do seems nonsensical to me, particularly as he claims to be a financial journalist.

Anyway I'm sure he gets it right on occasions, I guess you're bound to. I just don't know how you can look at the chart in isolation from operations. Do you know mfm if Zak Mir publishes any data to show how well his predictions turn out, I'd be interested as naturally I'm hoping there's something in this EUZ chart of his! :)

I didn't say that, I said "If you're here to the end the drill results really are more important anyway", different.

Interesting trade "The Open Mineral model will rely on a success-based fee, which will depend on the value/chemical composition of the material and the volume transacted. The platform currently focuses on zinc, lead, copper, gold and silver concentrate markets". So as the saying goes 'All that glitters is not gold', notable that LR rarely posts on Linkedin on silver, always pushing zinc our most important product.

mfm yes that's a fair point. I like the bit where he always says this is where it's going if it's going up unless it falls below this point in which case it will be going down. Guess I'm a bit cynical about charting, but someone was on here saying they've had results following Zak Mir so what do I know. If you're here to the end the drill results really are more important anyway.