Member Info for SelfishMcNimby

Hopefully that won't be too long.

Deemule

Operating costs per barrel were higher due to significantly increased water disposal costs, which will be reduced when the water disposal wells are brought online.

Cheerio.

Micky, all you do is attack anyone who posts anything other than negativity, you make personal attacks on David Bramhill who is regarded by many UJO shareholders with affection, and you support the trolls who spend their life on here. Of course I'll insult you.

He has a very low head.

Do you ever look at your posting history MickyBee. Yours is full of lengthy, well researched informative posts, with links to great websites where shareholders can improve their knowledge of issues surrounding the company and the industry as a whole. You are to be congratulated.

MickyBee
In reply to RNST I posted:
'Another idiot. There's been plenty on here today. Not a UJO share amongst them'

You just posted:
'More lies Nimby , your posts are fully of them , shareholder since 2015'

Are you claiming to be an idiot, Micky? Who'd have thought it!

Thanks Jack. Appreciated.

Idiot. So you don't think they got oil with the completion fluids they recovered? What do you think the pump was pumping, Stinky Pete's bogies? Berk.

Another idiot. There's been plenty on here today. Not a UJO share amongst them lol.

What rubbish, RSETaster. You have no idea whether or not that have been able to pump oil to surface? Next you'll be saying they used a long handled teaspoon.

You're the one not understanding, RSETaster. There's a big difference between recovering oil to surface, and being able to state that you can measure a flow.

That means there's plenty of sugar, persimmon. Should turn out nice and strong.

Definitive - serving to provide a final solution or to end a situation

What definitive results from WNA-2 would you like persimmon.

'liquid hydrocarbons have been recovered to surface'

God, you don't think they lost it, do you? Whatever next?

Moron.

Take it like a man, for God's sake NVG. You made yourself look stupid, time to stop digging. Plus your filling this bb with nonsense and putting people off reading it.

Well done NVG. You made yourself look a right plum with just 1 post.

Is that supposed to support some argument, Unabashed? Pathetic. Try to find factual statements, not tongue in cheek chat. It makes you look an irrelevant plonker.

The fact is, I was probably right, wasn't I RNST. Unlike this little gem which makes you look a bit of a liar to be frank, since you want to play 'silly posts'.

Rubey posted
'Mr I, you clearly believe the primary school maths that was promoted by some of the idiots on here (that was you by the way). The value was set at 0.675p, which had been the average share price over the period leading up to the offer. Corallian shares were valued at £3.20.'

You posted
'And exactly who decided that the Corallian price should be set at £3.20 given that the last raise was at £2.20.
Not only did they issue 500mm shares they did it at a valuation almost 50% higher than the priceset less than 5 months earlier?... what's happened since then to add 50%??.'

To which Rubey replied
'RNST:
'the last raise was at £2.20.
That figure was set on 21st November 2019 - before Corallian were awarded the Victory gas licence.'

You posted
'Rubey
Wrong, it was set on 30/11/2020 357916 shares at £2.20 each. See companies house records.
Try to keep up.'

To which Rubey replied
'RNST.
https://www.investegate.co.uk/reabold-resources--rbd-/rns/exercise-of-warrants-in-corallian/202012010700040156H/
'On 21 November 2019, Warrants were issued to all Corallian shareholders on the register at that date'