Member Info for Seifert

Retrace or correction? I think the pack of traders have concluded that they want a correction, not a simple retrace. And the FOMC have conveniently provided a pretext for another quite meaningless round of speculation.

And so this lamentable sage continues... It would be the decent thing to reimburse all those shareholders who believed in the mediocrities that brought things to this deplorable state. But finance has no honour.

I am still waiting for my entry price to be reached, which I have set at 80 pence. I will be back when this arrives. Good day all!

At £20 a pop, this is over priced (to put it mildly). Speculators pushing this one up. I would buy at £15, not at these prices. - Disclosure, not invested here. It's a good business, but only worth buying into at the right price.

Tell that story to those investors who came in here (and the previous incarnation, Vallar) at £10 a pop! Flight 747 from Rio to Paris comes to mind. Great plane, flawed decision making by the pilots! Sure, it's just one of those things. - Disclosure, I am not invested here, and have no plans to invest. Too volatile. It's a speculators' punt (at least at the present time).

And who do you suppose is more responsible (and hence odious) in your view in regards the share price of Pennon, politicians, or speculators? Perhaps they are one and the same! - Disclosure, I am not invested here, and not looking to buy in at the current price. Would consider buying in on a retrace.

Still waiting for the share price to rise (or at least stabilise?....) Perhaps tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow, draws in a petty broker's pace from dime to dime, counting up his pennies for a trivial rhyme, frustrating loyal investors such as Opium et al, with mockery, and befuddlement at the antics of a short trader's trail, or roguery and robbery and self-rogering too, it seems as if these geezers are made of unearthly poo. - And the rest, dear friend, is silence!

But pray, dear sir, what other than trivia and and the stuff inconsequential is financialisation? It's very premise and raison d'etre is nothingness personified.

Sector focus or Speculator focus?

Define 'slight'?

Having absorbed Xstrara, you're telling me they want to absorb this one too? I don't think so!!!!

Arbitrageurs?

Well, in my opinion you are far more likely to profit from Bumi's gyrations as a Barkrie than a Rothschild. But hey - that's just my take on things! - Good morning and have a great day!

The donkey in me would like to know how the wisdom of a man, founding a shell company at £10 a share (Vallar) subsequently transmuted into Bumi, ends up at the current price, together with boardroom shenanigans resulting in the ouster of said man, that one can still feel that said man is worth backing and following? The blind leading the blind (add your own pertinent epithets) comes to mind! - Disclosure, I am not invested here at all at present, but only watching. I wish all retail investors to have their investments rewarded (their trust in said man is outside my understanding). Good luck!

B.t.O. = Beware the Obvious.

You would be better advised giving your vote, and confidence, to a donkey instead!

QE = Quarantine Entrypoint

Thanks for your reply. But to speak freely, Nat. Rothschild was the cause of all these problems. Retail punters investors on the back of him (their problem, not his, I admit). This man is not equipped mentally to deal with the type of characters like Mr. Tan and the Bakries and their respective agents. He does not have the guile and cunning they possess. You need a crook to root out a crook, and, let's face it, crooks can make you a lot of money. But not the Nats of this world, I'm afraid. If it happens, it's pure fluke! - Good evening to you.

Volumes are so light, one wonders if you are the sole buyer? Just a thought. Good luck with your trades.

PEARS(on) from Spain or coconuts from Thailand? I'll take the coconuts, thank you very much!