RE: Does Alpha Growth really need the RCF?2 Jul 2020 00:27
I am sorry but I don’t buy the idea that a revolving credit facility (RCF) is no longer required.
Let’s look at this with some logic and insight.
The nature of the “HYBRID” fund has never been properly explained by the company, and it is now off the table, it seems.
Let me explain what I think went wrong with the HYBRID fund and why there is still a need for the RCF.
The US market is swamped by institutions flogging senior life settlements, so how on earth can a tiddler on the LSE break into that market? Answer …..Tax efficiency via a Cayman Islands limited partnership. That is the only USP that Alpha has, and it has been bigged up by the company as such.
BOAGF is a limited partnership based in the Cayman Islands, it is still the company’s core objective according to its website.
A limited partnership is a partnership which is managed by a “general partner” and any number of “limited partners” can subscribe for participation units. The limited partners have their investment risk limited to the value of their participation units whereas the general partner has unlimited risk. The general partner usually mitigates its risk by incorporating as a limited company with $1 liability to creditors upon dissolution.
So who is the general partner? It is a limited company called BOAGF GP LLC, also based in Cayman Islands. Who are the members of BOAGF GP Limited? They are SL Investment Management Ltd based in Chester UK and Alpha Longevity Management Ltd based in British Virgin Islands. It would charge a fee based upon AUM, and split that fee between the members.
How does a limited partnership work?
A participation unit is a combination of a small equity capital contribution, say $100 and a large loan, say $10 million. So when the investment proceeds are delivered, the loan is paid off preferentially and any surplus becomes a capital gain on the $100 capital contribution. Capital gains pay less tax than income in most jurisdictions, and with US investors paying tax on worldwide income that is a boon.
The HYBRID fund seems to have offered participation units which no-one wanted, so in the absence of that, a new source of working capital is required for BOAGF, hence the need for RCF.
It might be that the consultancy work from SMA will turn a dollar, but the big money will come from access to the RFC. Of that I am sure.
Without the RCF there is no big business to be done. The next news must be about the RCF or it will be carnage