Member Info for Scoobydriver

lol patx.

congratulations, you are now the proud recipient of not only the "poppy ****" of the month award, but also the golden "balderdash" of the year award.

imagine trying to flip your daft comments by saying you gave the facts, i provided the conclusion. you very much loaded the gun, aimed then fired, whilst i simply told you what you hit

your credibility hit a new low based on this latest attempt to besmirch another.

just when i was beginning to warm to some of your thoughts and look forward to debating your contributions.

If your implying what I think you are Patx, that's quite an implication to make.

So making sense of your post your telling us that you believe the "big seller" was missing today because he was at the AGM

Are you expecting me to believe "he" could not set up a limit sell of his shares and can only conduct stock market activities when not at the day job for a couple of hours.

That's preposterous.

Pleased the last few days seeing late reported trades from the "big seller" was not repeated today.

Wonder why.

Sold out.

Unwilling to sell at this level.

Needed cash and raised what was needed.

Now on a free carry after selling half.

Have decided it's worth holding.

Who knows, but be nice if we have bottomed, and "big seller" is done.

Yup No6, know the name etc, just wondering if that is what that piece of kit has been used for. Does look pretty new so perhaps not?

Fare comment red. I imagine some of your questions go unanswered simply because there is no one reading that knows 100% for sure the answer and can back that up with any proof.

What I would say to answer the whole project is this. The guys at phe will be fully aware of what they are and are unable to proceed with, and along with that what they need to prove/demonstrate in order to comply with whatever regulations they will be governed by.

Now I don't know, but it could well be that it is the same as what happens elsewhere and that a scaled model, created in the exact same way, using the exact same materials and operating / withstanding the same forces is acceptable?

But I don't know if that is the case, looking at say the construction of bridges for example,. I've seen many a "how do they do that" programme where before going full scale a model is made to measure forces and prove structural integrity etc

Not saying it's the same, but it's possibly a similar scenario. I'm thinking about say the nuclear industry, much more hazerdous than a kiln. I don't for one minute think that Windscale was tested after construction to prove it's safety. I'd think more likely whatever tech / material / structure/ control or operating system involved would be approved for use based on tests along the way?

That in the 4th qrt with phe ready to commission and everything having been done project wise to get to this stage safely, on budget, on time and successfully.

There will be a few posters on here that find fault with the buffet selection, the interior decor or the baby changing facilities at the "grand opening" and continue with their negativity

Hi swazers. I presume the carbolite in the picture is the piece of kit used to carry out all the R&D over the years

Was it David Ryan that said a while back that phe had been asked to remove it from the university.

Fingers crossed it's a simple case of scaling things up like happens in many other areas to prove a concept etc.

What were you expecting thaiger. We've been told the aim is 4th quarter for pilot plant to be ready to commission. Until some other bits of kit arrive there will not be much work to do on the actual kiln.

A couple of bits of shrink wrap protecting motors etc, that's not going to delay things from I'd imagine

Congratulations, you've won 1st prize for the dumbest post today. Possibly even this year

£4m or thereabouts in bank and sure Paul stated that all the other components are on order and paid for and will be arriving on site. That leaves general running costs / wages etc. No need to raise any cash at this moment in time, and with the likes of the NH deal being funded by the customer then that's a good thing

Yup alkin.

I'm a recent interview Paul did say about going down the licence and royalties road.

Maybe since him taking over as ceo and doing a complete review, it's been decided that's far easier, more cost effective and still a lucrative business model.

That's one of the things which I see as potentially very lucrative.

Said in a previous post that Paul mentioned landfill being about £120/tonne.

I stated then that for arguments sake say that waste was diverted to a site running phe tech, or even a phe operated site (was this the 12 full size kiln reason?)

And that waste was taken at a discount at say £50/tonne. That's a huge amount of £ available. But why would they need to discount landfill. The pressure is on to reduce landfill so I'm now thinking it might not need to be done at a level much lower than current?

All very speculative, and still a long way off, but no doubt everyone thought the same when we were told that in the future you'd be able to book a holiday, check the weather, do your banking, order your shopping and send video messages on your phone to the other side of the world in real time.

If Ianmp's AHT success follows them with their phe purchase I would take you up on that invite Salop. Strawberry Dachari from the deck whilst watching a setting sun over the pacific coast sounds about perfect.

You never know

I've never heard of that either tatty. Another cool find. All we need now is Starmer to tell us that phe will be part of GB energy supply chain with their tech the length and breadth of the UK.

Who knows what the future might hold. Waste to Energy / Hydrogen is not going away that's for sure.

Good work Salop, always good to have some proper "horses mouth" information. Seems it's a waiting game, I've time.

PHE contracted MDKL with the build of a pilot plant, a full size plant and talk of a further 12 "full size" 2.5m kilns.

Q1 What happened to the completed MDKL pilot plant which was shipped out Aug 2023.

Q2. There must have been quite a plan in progress if a further 12 "full scale" kilns were going to be produced, what was/is the plan.

Q1

Never seen so much news on waste to energy / biochar etc etc. Seems like it's on everyone's lips and minds.

Surely phe can promote what they're about and capatalise on all the noise.

Again we agree Patx. There was the recent interview where Paul talked more about phe could be more raising revenue from licenceing and involvement with project / engineering work going forward as opposed to anything else.

Probably be something that will end up being whatever is the easiest and/or the most profitable.

Like you say, every council area will have a landfill with many places already having separated waste collection. Could in time a % of UK plastics end up in a place like protos where phe benefit financially.

Time will tell

Lot of effort made there red. I'm unsure what to make of the whole UHL thing.

It certainly looks like they are looking like a kind of "one stop shop" for all things hydrogen related.

I'd imagine, like anything else, some of the horses running under the UHL colours will do well, others might not. As for phe then their part is to prove their process, what becomes of the NH framework agreement we'll need to wait and see.

Going forward, I'd think if phe can concentrate on the UK market following a successful commissioning, with work/orders/contracts coming in then that's still quite a sizable pie.

Can't remember who, but someone posted a while back that the "seller" was not connected to the recent warrants.

Been a gradual fall since they were added to the market however, wondering if that is actually what's going on here as they are cashed in?

Does anyone know how this can be found out?

J

Wonder what the difference is between NH and Patriot then Red.

Looks to be 2 businesses offering the same thing from the same conglomerate. I'll need to have more of a look out if interest at what all UHL is covering.