RE: Medusa19 antigen test usability study12 May 2021 17:20
Ok, back now. Just give some more details whilst it's fresh in my head. In no particular order.
When he told us he'd run out of tests, I said "sure you can't find anymore". He said "just wait" and nipped out of the room for a bit. Came back and said "sorry lads, we don't have any left. Wish we did because we need the numbers". I said "Can't you nip out and get some more? Where are the tests, Liverpool?". He looked a bit taken aback by that and he hesitatingly said "Err, no, somewhere in Cambridgeshire, I think"
Asked him what the read time was. He said "20 minutes". Then I said "Don't you get a decent read after 10 minutes, though". He said "Well it depends how much virus there is. Do you know about viral loads?". I said "Yeh, I know a bit about ct values and I know that the Avacta test is 100% at ct<27". He started laughing. He said "Well, you get a very clear read line pretty quickly when the person's got a high viral load". (sorry, guys, I regret not asking him to put a number of minutes on that, but the way he said it made it sound pretty quick to me). I then said to him "It pretty much blows Mologic out of the water, doesn't it". He started laughing again.
Perhaps the most encouraging thing I took from that is when he said with a really pleased look on his face "The study has gone really well". It was like he couldn't wait to tell me and Robbo that (he looked pretty pleased, didn't he Robbo). What was more impressive was that he volunteered that information early on and we hadn't even asked him about the success or otherwise of the study.
Need a brew and a fag. Will update if I remember other stuff.