RE: Veative17 Dec 2022 17:45
Been studying the RNS more closely today and there’s several encouraging things in there for me. For instance:
1. They made $2m revenue in the 3 months to 31 Oct from ‘enterprise’ clients through VR offerings. That’s sales to businesses, rather than schools (which I’d noticed from Veatives job advertisements, that it was an area they were getting into). That’s equates to $8m rev per annum going forward, from a source completely independent of their school offerings.
2. Veative ‘India’ rev was £1.3m from 19 Jul - 31 Oct (post Veative acquisition, that is), equating to £5m (pounds) per annum going forward. Not sure exactly what the Indian IP is specifically, but it is independent of LMC income, or other Veative international income.
3. Lenovo have already committed to pre-purchasing 4000 Veative licenses for next year. I’ve noticed Lenovo have suddenly woke up on their VR Classroom offering these past 3 months. Most likely because VR STEM generally seems to be gaining a lot of traction in schools across USA & Canada.
Cheer up guys, the parrot’s certainly not dead yet. And, by the way, Chris is a very decent guy. A little naive, perhaps, to get involved with Bonnier et al, but there’s no way he will want to see heavily invested people he is close to (and I’m not talking about Robert, Chris A or Alan etc) lose out by letting this company go to the wall.
One last thing, Chris chose to step down as CEO. He is an innovator and an excellent salesman and that’s what he wants to get back to.
Like everybody else here, I’m completely hacked off having a large amount of capital tied up here for the foreseeable. Just felt the need, though, to dispel a couple of misconceptions (nice word for untruths).
Cue the abuse, but I don’t mind one bit, since I’m booked in for my next Thai massage quite soon. 250 Baht 1 hour.
Scaredy - Chiang Mai