RE: Partnership Agreement30 May 2020 13:26
In my opinion Krone, if there is a grant and a partnership is formed then this would in its simplest form would be an agreement for the development and treatment of Covid-19. I dont think the partner would be granted a license for anything else non corona virus related.
However, the treatment may be suitable to use for similar, but non Covid 19 related ailments. Furthermore, the drug if suitable for the treatment of Covid-19 may well be suitable for any similar SARS virus.
I am sure these areas of permitted usage will have been discussed and negotiated already, if not already discussed are and will be in progress.
It should have no effect on 1801 for anything else. 1801 can be continued with a protected patent and wholly owned by Sareum except with a license for covid related diseases.
If we have interested parties ( as TM say we do) and a party does choose or has already chosen to undergo a partnership ( subject to grant of course), things will hot up very quickly and so will the SP.
With regards to a timeline it did not take long for the unknown Chinese pharma to take up the license opportunity. For peanuts? Maybe. The important part here is there was never any hint of such negotiations taking place.
Sareum to some may appear slow in progress. However, I as well as many others believe they have taken their time to get things right. Show me a compound they have which has performed poorly. They have placed their expertise on getting their compounds spot on.
As a question here:- What comes first the grant or the partner? Since the grant will not be enough to complete on its own that only leads to one conclusion. Negotiations are already taking place, loose ends need tidying up, the grant granted and a lovely little RNS indicating the state of play.
A friend over in Manila facing heavy lockdown as province just recorded 1000 new cases yesterday. There have been riots recently and people shot and killed. No mention of this on main stream media of course. Covid-19 is not going soon and neither are its mutations.
It takes time to get things right as opposed to throw any old 1st generation inhibitor, with ( in some cases severe side affects ) with the ultimate objective of making big bucks on nigh obsolete old treatments. Remdisivir has not been granted a license for general use by the NDA only for emergency use only.
I digress, in my opinion we will know by the end of June close to 5 weeks. That is my best guestimate. I can not see any reason as to why it should take longer.
The priority is to produce a first class product that will cure people and limit the death toll. If any of the newbies or even those that claim to have been here years know of any potentially better compound /treatment available then please let us know who and what they are.
Regards all.