Member Info for Rudey

**** me, jonesrichard, it will take many months I'm afraid. Look at Egdon's RNS's for Wressle - it will give you a good idea of the process.

is hard to find. Look what happened at Holmwood and Wressle for year after year (amongst many others). The only good council I know of covers West Newton, luckily for RBD.
I'm glad to see SS is suggesting going straight to the Planning Inspectorate - the quickest route to get this stupid decision overturned.

But it will still take a lot longer and be more expensive than a human challenge study Bronx. I have no idea why you use words like 'unfortunately', this will have no impact on hVIVO's work programme regarding Covid-19 human challenge studies or it's forthcoming rise in share price. I'm all for pro's and con's being posted, but something doesn't smell right about the tone of your posts.

No, they are not going straight to production Bronx. They aren't cutting corners either. They still need to go through the various stages to comply with regulations which will take a lot longer without a human challenge study being one of the stages.

On that I rather agree AS.

So you have provided no evidence to back up your earlier statement that John Oxford 'is not writing Cathal's script', or that CF is talking bs.
The fact remains that at a time when we need top experts in virology within the company and a person in charge to sell the company to new clients and potential buyers, we have a company advisory board that includes pretty much the top man in the world on Coronavirus' and an enthusiastic Chairman with a reputation as a great deal maker and entrepreneur. In my opinion.

Thanks AquaeSulis01 for posting that. Very interesting, but I couldn't find any reference by John Oxford to duration of immunity with antibodies or climate impact on the virus, which were the points I believe you raised earlier as being examples of CF bs? Please correct me if I'm wrong - I did breeze through the summary.

With Professor John Oxford on the company advisory board I'm sure Cathal's opinions on the duration of antibody effectiveness and the impact on the virus of the local seasonal climate carry some considerable weight.

deepjoy, I don't know why you are bothering with the prat. I had the same thing with him when he said the clinic was freehold, when in fact it's leasehold. I had the same thing with him after a previous CF interview when I said CF was clearly telling us he was about to do a placing, and Jimzi said I was clearly trying to get a better price. A week later there was a placing.
The bloke just won't accept he's human and sometimes gets it wrong.

WTF are you on about Jimzi. Just another example of you getting your facts wrong and being unable to accept it. These bb's provide opportunities to learn something important - I do regularly thanks to the experience and hard work of other posters. Take your blinkers off and you may make better decisions.

If I remember correctly, Cathal said in a recent interview that, for some reason, Acacia were dribbling them out onto the market. They can't have many if any left, but I think there's more impact on the share price now from impatient pi's selling. News or numbers will kick this share price up a few notches in no time.

For what it's worth, my best mate runs an AIM listed company, and he reckons share transfers to mm's can be listed as O trades.

It's obvious ALL Acacia's shares have been dumped on the market. There was no nod and a wink deal with 'some other party' insti as you keep suggesting Jimzi - look at the share price - it says it all.
And to back that up Cathal himself has said they were or are being sold on the open market - much to his annoyance as the placing was the perfect time to move them on without hitting the share price.

I can give you one, if you insist. In my local there's a bloke with terrible B.O., and whenever he comes in the atmosphere changes for the worse. You're the bloke with B.O. on this bulletin board.

' give us one of your pub stories again'
What do you mean, 'again' moniman? Please provide a previous example.

What a fantastic post moniman. Thank you, thank you, thank you. I'm sure we all bow to your great knowledge and superior intellect.
Feckin eejit

So why do you spend so much time reading it moniman?

I believe the person in South Korea was tested for the presence of the virus a second time, before it had fully left his system, so both tests were positive but he was only infected once.

From the article:
'Experts have questioned the usefulness of the tests because little has been known about whether antibodies protect people from the virus'
Tell me if I'm wrong, but nobody's had it twice so far, have they? If I'm right, there obviously is a degree of immunity, whether it's a for a few weeks, a few months or a few years. Maybe the people Cathal speaks to are right, and it's going to be 2 or 3 years?

Adding a comma in the right place to clarify my meaning:

Exactly right KTRB. I understand their trials aren't quarantine clinic based, as you imply.