Member Info for RuckRover

GF,
" I guess your comments just show your own personal frustrations with delays in your own timescales"
I think that is a little harsh. I think many LTH's are frustrated at the delay meeting the company's own published timescale's never mind any personal expectations.
There is now some progress, there is funding and there is light at the end of tunnel.
But don't be surprised if patient holders get a little irked at the "tick tick", "on track for £8" sound bites.

TF,

Any reason you felt it necessary to edit Inan's post and omit:

"My £8 a share is still on track ........."

I take it you felt that destroyed the credibility of an otherwise quite reasonable post?

C7,
"Thank the Lord we can rely on the scientific genius yourself, AB, Crackin and Kashdog provide us with, lol"

Fortunately, the only scientific genius we need to rely on is LD and the fantastic team she has assembled.

Ivy,
Quite right, they are just irrelevant noise. Strange that some get so worked up about it.

WTP
"You should sell up then perhaps ruck?"
Why? Because I have realistic expectations and don't attempt to ramp?
I have held strong for 10 years. I have supported every fund raise. I have done my research and am comfortable with the risk reward. I am optimistic that this will do well.
So please don't come on here and try and dictate to me what I should do.

I have to agree, 5p is the more likely.

It's just amusing to see the blatant rampers getting indignant over a bit of de-ramping.

WTP,
Could you explain why 5p is nonsense but £8 isn't? Surely both are equally possible.

Cleaner,
I'm afraid £5 is far less likely than 5p. You are actually giving crackin some credibility with comments like that.

"getting closer"

A bit like getting up from your chair and saying you've moved closer to the sun.

WTP,
As burble says, this device has always been on the Modify trial.
It was the SCIB1 combo trial that changed from Trigrid2 to needle free.

Watch out for a new alias - crackskin!

Scousemark,
What you have to remember is that it is impossible to estimate a value. It completely depends on how successful the trials are. So ultimately any value between 0p and £2 is theoretically possible. I suspect crackin's comment was tongue in cheek or wishful thinking. I don't think serious investors who have done their homework, considered and accepted the risk/reward ratio should be perturbed by it.

Lofas,
Nobody is going to come up with a valuation based on 50% success given where Scancell are right now. 10% is where Trinity Delta think it should be. Having said that, even at 10% they think 24p (fully diluted)

Maybe tomorrow?

C7,
This could easily spiral out of control.

C7,
Post recced

ratty,
post recced.

TF,
Post recced.

AB,
I noticed that yesterday, at the time no recs for your original post and 3 for Ray's word for word cut and paste.
Just goes to show that people rec the poster and not what's written lol. Unless they were sarcastic recs? How can you tell?

Morning All,
I was sorry to hear about your recent hospitalisation C7 but glad you came through ok. Same to you Ivy.

I agree, 14p is a joke. I have always maintained we are worth double that even where we are now. I think being grossly undervalued has just become the norm for Scancell. That will change a some point. Who knows when news will land - could be in 5 minutes lol!