Member Info for RuckRover

C7,
I agree with you. It would be better if TF didn't bring toxicity to this board.

DeAar,
"That's because you've been conditioned to to go against everything he says on the other board Gazza."

No, I only go up against the "codswallop" . Oh, hang on, you're right that is everything he says.

Ray,
If that is the point he's making it is not very clear. It sounds like he is waiting for one.

TF,
"Inan has posted a reminder - 'On the eve of 1 month since first person dosed ... at full dosage - still no RNS on toxicity'."

Who on earth is expecting an RNS on toxicity. I'm expecting an RNS with some positive data. I'd have thought if there were any toxicity problems we'd have heard by now?

Bermuda,

Thanks for the link, very interesting.
I too can't wait to see how this group of patients are faring.

"And I stand by the other comment about your posting there"
Even though it is factually inaccurate? (aka "a lie")

TF,

So not only do you bring disruption to this board by posting Inan's codswallop but you completely misrepresent what goes on on the other board. I am NOT one of the main posters. THE main poster is Inan. For example yesterday:

Inan 36 posts
Lozan 5 posts
Tosh 5 posts
Ivy 3 posts
gazza (me) 2 posts.

Do us all a favour and leave the other board where it is.

C7,

I am really surprised there has been no RNS yet. I was expecting one yesterday (as it was Tuesday, news is way overdue and there has been a steady rise).
Some information you just can't stop escaping. But when it is evident it has I think it is the responsibilty of the company to make an announcement so everyone is on the same footing.

A similar thing happened before the moditope announcement in 2012. A few days before the SP rose and the volumes were high. This was exceptional, most news releases that cause a lift in the SP did not cause a ripple beforehand.

TF,

We have several good poster on this board who actually know what they are talking about.
I don't see what value there is in posting utter codswallop from the other board. If people want to read what's posted there they can go and read it themselves surely?

TF,
Posted previously by falsedawn, the AIM rules on disclosure are:

" An AIM company must issue notification without delay of any new developments which are not public knowledge which, if made public, would be likely to lead to a significant movement in the price of its AIM securities. By way of example, this may include matters concerning a change in:
— its financial condition;
— its sphere of activity;
— the performance of its business; or
— its expectation of its performance."

I think the wording is pretty clear "MUST issue" , "WITHOUT DELAY", ANY new developments.
Whether these rules are carried out to the letter in practice is another matter. The withholding of bad news is likely to have a bigger impact on shareholders than positive news. If there were a severe adverse event the "we wanted to be sure" line isn't going to hold up.

C7,
The 25 in the accounts 2021 won’t include directors who are paid a consultancy fee rather than salary.

The 37 include directors.

Update on the above...

There could be up to 37 employees now.

Morning C7,

The accounts for 2021 report an average of 25 employees. This was an increase of 3 over 2020.
We will get the 2022 accounts in October so it will be interesting to see how many have been added.

Thanks TF.
Nice to see some have a sense of humour and a sense of reality.

GF,
There was absolutely nothing negative towards Scancell in my post.
It was perhaps slightly tongue in cheek and aimed at posters who get carried away by a job advert.

If you grasp of English doesn't allow you to understand that, that is your problem.

Hi GF,
You ask:
"Why are you even here as an investor and posting such rubbish? "

And what was the rubbish I posted:
"For anyone invested in Tesco, I heard they are recruiting checkout operators."

TF has it right, you have completely overreacted. Not only that, but you are completely wrong in your conclusion.

I am invested here because I believe in the company, the science and the products. I believe that we will all get a good return from our investments should the products prove successful.

You have to have the belief that the company are capable of developing the product to a final success. This would include amongst other things ensuring finances were in place and their recruitment ensured adequate numbers of people with the appropriate skills. This should be a given.

Forgive me for not getting too exited over the occasional "situations vacant" column in the Oxford gazette. I'm reserving my excitement for some good solid data and news from any of the three trials in progress followed by a big rise in the SP.

For anyone invested in Tesco, I heard they are recruiting checkout operators.

Hasiba,
"The technicals are great"
How are you interpreting the "technicals"?

It does sort of emphasise the point that high risk investments like SCLP should be with money you are prepared to loose or at least money you won't be needing in the near future. I have been invested 10 years, I think 50p is more than achievable but I can't say whether it will be in a year or another 10!

Lol!
It doesn't take much to cause a few ripples of excitement does it.
Last I heard, Zachari was a wholly owned subsidiary of Scancell Ltd. It has no staff, no assets, no desk and chairs and no computer equipment. It is hardly surprising that it shares the same registered office as it's parent. Looks like an oversight that it has taken longer to change.