Member Info for roses

or Scancell for that matter (not having a go) just seems like you're out of sorts at the moment

C7, maybe best to get some more sleep. That has absolutely nothing to do with what we are discussing.

Although with one caveat as the last (80k) trade was a UT trade while in auction after the close, it could be a buy or a sell, as the MM's can do what they like while in auction to try and make people think what they want them to !

bobbust - you are 100% correct

Come on inanaco you're getting sloppy.

That is a black crow with a little bit of white.

here is a white crow
http://www.birdsandblooms.com/blog/albino-bird-a-white-crow/

C7 - just catching up on some posts and was surprised to see yours as you said you were cancelling your membership yesterday ?

"what you have to remember all the placings that occurred in the past had to happen to get to this point"

Lol

And the next few placings will be to get to the next point !

I wouldn't say that 'rarely does a company ' give a reason

but it is very, very common for a reason not to be given.

just popped up through nex.

Wonder if agema will acknowledge this further 100k buy.

Probably not as he 'really has to go'

What's your record for how many times in a couple of hours that you tell us "I have to go now"

Anyway will leave it to you to carry on deramping it.
Try not to get too desperate, see you in a bit ?

agema, It wasn't my error, I was just going off companies house data

https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/officers/8QUXabfd43IpPY3dbepxAa4dh6A/appointments

It's very strange that agema made such a big deal out of the 100k sell and somehow forgot to mention that the very next trade was a 100k buy !

Yes I know.

She was appointed a director of Investec Structured Products Calculus VCT plc in February 2011. and if you check companies house for her directorships, it has all her others but nothing current for Calculus.

I thought you really had to go, Lol. more tosh from agema !

She has now moved to the Finsbury growth and income trust
(which has nothing to do with Scancell)

Thanks agema, I usually am.

However Kate is no longer in her position at calculus.

she was also a non exec at Arcis biotechnology which she resigned from a few months ago,

looks like she just wants a change - normal for non execs.

Straight from the company RNS

"Kate has made an important contribution in guiding Scancell through its formative years during her time on the Board and in her role as chairman of the Remuneration Committee"


Chairman of the Remuneration Committee nothing more nothing less.

Non execs usually hold multiple directorships and chop and change all the time.

Nice try agema.

I thought you had to go ???

According to the institute of Directors, Non-executive directors are expected to focus on board matters and not stray into ‘executive direction,’ thus providing an independent view of the company that is removed from day-to-day running.

Non exec directors are a dime a dozen and don't have any material effect on the direction of the company.

"Non-executive directors provide independent oversight and serve on committees concerned with sensitive issues such as the pay of the executive directors and other senior managers; they are usually paid a fee for their services but are not regarded as employees."