Member Info for Rolf1001

Santos. Another thing you’re wrong about. Why are you always so wide of the mark? You have geriatric relevance syndrome fyi.

So santos, when I have an opinion it’s arrogance. When you have an opinion it’s what? Pomposity? Tedium? Please let me know sage of the middle office lassonde curve.

Supra isn’t the sharpest either is he? Christ alive.

I guess he wasn’t very sure of his facts for about 40 years of his professional life then. And it must be a complete coincidence considering who his employers are now.

I don’t think you’re naive, I think you are pompous.

Https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/minority/at-hearing-warren-calls-out-bessent-for-denying-basic-facts-about-affordability

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-treasury-secretary-caught-blatant-201904473.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAAY7D9hVeiXh1qT_Uyj2tBWhkT25FZfN1b_V3omrCu8KN7x3QibmOhqddbAxtET_jp1eiN2OWC_dUZxisKTpwg-4FUGeh4pHm9MxaqMcUdedmJhhdWCKJSdQPZ151ApLHj7BUePGhty3txE2AfNwMOpAYptPWDC_SlI9WfDTC8Id

Santos, I don’t know what you mean. Bessent sent a note to investors during the first trump presidency saying that tariffs cause inflation. Since he is involved in the second presidency he says tariffs don’t cause inflation.

They discussed it during a congressional hearing.

But apparently he is a man of infinite integrity who only cares about facts and wouldn’t say anything politically filtered.

Who cares what rate of inflation he mentioned, that has nothing to do with it.

You don’t understand what I’m saying. It’s my fault, I apologise, I assumed you were an adult who had didn’t need things spelling out in simplistic, middle office terms.

I’m waiting for the deflection.

Santos I am aware who he was. ‘Factual point’ is the contention here. Are these the same type of factual points he has made in the past about the effect of tariffs on US consumers, for example? He used to tell his investors that they were inflationary. Now, he says there is no inflation and tariffs are not being passed onto consumers. I wonder why. Ps, he lied about saying that in a congressional hearing.

He is a political figure making politically filtered statements. As I said, a child would understand that. But maybe middle office can’t. Looking forward to your deflection.

Santos, you’re such a snowflake. I thought it’s quite clear to everyone why Scott bessent would say what’s he’s saying? Surely even a child or someone in middle office understands that an official from the US government is going to claim that Iran are in a terrible position and possibly a much worse predicament than they actually are in? I thought that would be obvious and would mean that you’d take that strong possibility into account when citing and analysing what that person is saying.

Santos

I wonder why Scott bessent would be saying that? Surely a man of unlimited resource and sagacity such as yourself would understand the framework of his comments?

The pentagon ‘memo’ was in a Reuters article on Thursday evening. Whats all the hysteria on here for? 38%, 50% retraces? lol.

Nastynik picked the top maybe croftoriginal picked the bottom

Violin

Your first mistake is reading the daily telegraph.

The leaked email also says the US want to kick Spain out of NATO and as there is no expulsion clause that’s impossible.

Santos.

You are so dull. I don’t desire credibility on a rockhopper message board, populated by old, retired men with a screensaver of Rupert Lowe on their PC, copy and pasting from ChatGPT. Although if someone is incredibly wide of the mark I will point it out for the purposes of QA.

You would have been safe from any insider investigations because the compliance person tasked with sifting through your emails, bloombergs and calls would have fallen asleep before they could find anything.

‘It’s better to travel than arrive’ now closely rivals lassonde curve for tediousness. Have you said anything interesting ever?

Close above £1 on weekly should signal a push higher. Until then it’s just flagging. Breaking down below 70p isn't good news

Citing propaganda pieces such as this one undermines whatever credibility you had left. Give it a rest.

150usd short end oil price won’t have much lasting impact on the Rkh SP. Ask santos he’s the expert, but I’d expect a 150usd longer end price to cause inflation, global recession, massively increased borrowing costs etc so I doubt that scenario is of benefit to the Rkh SP either.

LTT, the commodities supercycle is going to be a thing.

Norseman

Because Israel have nuclear capability?

violinmuppet. the world is currently being held to ransom by iran and a load of $20,000 drones. all this nuke talk is israeli *******s.

Commonwealth citizens still have to qualify as residents to vote. But Guess that’s the payback for having the largest empire in history. Assumed someone like you would be proud of British history?