Member Info for Rolf1001

Happyinvestor

The market has ‘marked up’ Rkh more the. Navitas because Rkh was in the bin and suffered from horrific market sentiment. Rkh was undervalued last year, should have been 25-35p in Q124 rather than in the teens. Don’t expect Navitas to ‘catch up’

Retest this morning of the 62p support level almost exactly.

If anyone thinks retail investors are anything other than exit liquidity for institutions and insiders they are deluded. Thats why there’s people on here who’ve been bag holding for 15 years. Investors and funds don’t make money by doing anyone favours. Another box ticked. Risk reduced significantly. Game on.

Vol in 1H25 was about 4x recent average volume for the same period. That suggests to me positions were being built. People always know what’s going on before it does….

Looking at lines on charts, on the weekly timeframe last week was a perfect retest of both 62p support and the top of the ascending channel. Barring unforeseen, next stop 80-82p

Shell have a big presence in Argentina.

RalphIq141. Other than British guyana what were the British South American colonies that you talk about?

Regards.

I think If it closes HTF, weekly close perhaps, and holds around these levels 66-68p ish, it’s broken out of the channel and next stop is 80p

Nice one LUFC4eva. Congrats. It’s a shame some people on here think it’s unfeasible to have a 7 figure stack.

Nikb. Assuming you mean yuan. Consensus trade currently is to be offered USD

Not that it matters, but definitively Rkh is not 80% owned by institutions. Most of those are nominee accounts. SRM doesn’t even exist anymore.

There’s two agreements with Navitas. 1 - Pre FID secured loan is 8% annual interest. 2 - Post FID financing for 2/3 of capex which is interest free. Both repayable with 85% of FCF.

Rkh agreement with navitas states that 85% of phase A fcf must go towards paying back both loans. One of the penalties for not doing this is navitas taking control of rkhs 35% stake.

Zxy

Not credible? lol. I’ve clearly got a bigger bat than you my friend. It’s not like it’s a quid a share is it?

Apologies for my poor maths, I did the calculations in my head. I was slightly off. So yes £10k would be worth 15.5, not 17. My sincere apologies.

Ovets

I was referring directly to nazinick and iq141. Do not infer anything else. Unlike the ‘you people’ comments coming from the OAP and wing of the BNP to my right I am not one to jump to generalise.

As I said, I thought there may be some insights. I was interested to see if there was corroboration for the major I’d heard was being lined up as the farm in partner for example. But sadly, I got sidetracked by nazinick and his brand of daily mail dogma.

Mrs Lowe

I am here because of my 7 fig stack of Rkh shares I accumulated at an average of 11.23p during 1H24 once I found out in Jan 24 that things were working out. I thought there might be some interesting insights on this board. Sadly, mostly what I have read from you is more at home in the Mail Online comments section. And don’t get me started on the contributions of flat earther iq141. Someone needs to consfiscate his WiFi connection.

I haven’t been sat here since 2010 watching inflation and opportunity cost erode my holding. FYI if you bought £10,000 of Rkh in 2010 it needs to be worth about £17,000 today to break even.

Good luck

Iq141

I’m not reading any of what you cut and pasted. If I were you I would have spent the time thinking about what I can retrain as once AI takes my job next year

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2025/04/25/the-jobs-that-will-fall-first-as-ai-takes-over-the-workplace/

Norse, indeed it seems we will.

Kind regards

Sherlock

Nasty

What are you on about? Liberal students? The guardian? 5 year olds? Pipe down you nutcase. Have you forgotten your meds again? Why do you feel the need to come on here and rant about weird clickbaity stuff that you’ve read about in the Mail online. Please just calm down, and stick Eastenders on the tele, you’ll feel much better about the world.

Ps noosie. I like the way you call me Sherlock in a derogatory manner. As though being able to read and think rationally and logically is a terrible skill. Guess I'm better off parroting the reform party, right wing billionaire fed narratives that ‘you people’ speak in. At least you aren’t a flat earner like iq141. I hope so anyway.