Member Info for roger65

Personally expecting something out of the blue announcing a deal from one of the major pharmas Or sanofi results and then bang, an offer to buy the IP. At such a price it’s a reasonable risk for the possible rewards. Just a question as to how much they’d be willing to pay but even at multiples of current silly mcap it’s still total peanuts for the likes of AZ, pfz or J and J. Just need to avoid Alumni Capital getting their grey mitts in the till at the crucial moment.

They were given the shares for 0.1p so there is still a 50% profit less fees.

They didn’t. Please help him someone.

That delayed trade is almost certainly some forward selling of the next lot of shares about to be dumped on the market in two days time. Very naughty but those iis will have their pound of flesh by whatever means necessary.

More of those to come sadly. Another 4 to be precise. Think we’ll see .1p by end the week. Then that will be that. It’s the last possible bit of profit the lender can get now we’re at such all time lows.

Your figures are wrong JB (first tranches were for Jay over £700k) but regardless of this the outlook is still bleak. At this rate I might put in a bid for the company myself! Could a few of us muster £1m?

LSE deliberately misreporting trades again. Everything at .15 is a sell. How are they allowed to be so blatant about it?

Anyway, looks like it’s wrapping up time and someone’s finger is hovering over the light switch by the exit

Shame.

One can only surmise that J&J and Pfizer are not really that bothered about Trellus or else surely one of them would be doing something to secure the IP. Odd situation to have several agreements in place and Directors putting in their own money but for things to appear like it’s obviously heading for failure. Maybe suspension would be a good thing as the CLNs would stop and the endless dilution would come to a halt. Only thing then we could hope for is that someone makes a move to buy the IP for a few million bucks.

DoE closing date for applications is July 20th so I guess we’re going to have to struggle on for a few more months before there’s anything meaningful for Marechale.

No surprise that the uk govt is only putting in the minimum it can get away with without looking like they’re disinterested in supporting Weardale. Weardale now looking to the Department of Energy in the US for possible grant money to help close the funding gap . They are already partnered with KBR in the US so from what I can see this looks like a good plan. Combo of lithium and geothermal interests also ticks boxes so fingers crossed they can access rather more than the miserly £700k from the uk Govt . Critical minerals my a.se! Starmer and co paying lip service on all fronts but doing as little as possible which actually forces them to cough up cash - which admittedly they just don’t have .

Fingers crossed the US can help save this project - and spare Marechale Directors’ blushes.

LSBM and Janiax

You guys still here or jumped to safety?

Results of Sanofi trials due mid Q2. Can TRLS survive until that news drops? Talk about a close shave!

Bless you Latino, have you never heard of companies going into administration only to be picked up by the major shareholders for peanuts and then the mgmt team are kept on because they understand the core product better than anyone?

Anyway, what I can’t stand is posters like you who will post relentlessly about the positives and then naive investors buy in because of it, only to find themselves in the red and locked in almost as soon as they’ve hit the buy button!

Do you really not understand what happened here last week when the sp rose and then, ding ding, another two CLNs land? Please tell me you do…. Each to their own. Have a good w/e and see you on Monday for more Marla magic - or should that be Marla misery!

Price of lithium carbonate also heading back up.

Calm down Latino. Look, I get that you're desperate and rightly very angry with the company but I'm invested here too, albeit to a fraction of what you are going by your frantic posts now. Anything I say on here will make no difference to the final outcome, good or bad.

For now, I'm right about the level of misreporting and imo the reasons for it. Not fun.

Is it meaningful revenue Latino? No. OK not Zero but not even a month's costs for the time when that was generated. You're now clutching at straws and refusing to accept what is staring you in the face. That's a dangerous condition to find yourself in.

JB is I'm afraid totally correct. £440 of buys today but the mms would really like it if everyone believed there is a lot of buying going on because they need to dump another 48m shares on this already washed out market on April 21st. If this misreporting continues early next week then I'll sadly withdraw even though at a small loss. I only came in very recently and totally on a punt. Gut now screaming at me that this is only going one way. When the mms are desperate and can't even hide their misreporting it's time to wave goodbye.

Another sell marked as a 'buy' just in the last 15 mins. Buy price is .19p. Sell price is .1755

Why are the mms so determined to misreport what's going on here?

As I said, I fear we are approaching the death throes here with even small trades now being incorrectly reported by LSE. Alumni must be desperate to get away another CLN and mms are trying to deceive the market by displaying £10k of buys today when it's the exact opposite. Not fooling anyone and the sells just keep dribbling in. Alumni may have set their latest sell price too high for the market so at some point soon or early next week expect to see this take a another dip to anything between.12 and .17p and CLN shares will be dumped at about .15p. Still a whopping 50% profit for them so not all bad! Nice work if you can get it. bstrds

Sorry to say they are doing their utmost to deceive here. The 'buy' at .175 is almost certainly a sell. Buys are at .19p and sells currently .171 on HL

Well you're not the first person to say that in jest but.... my conspiracy theories proved to be correct three times on previous occasions - one was Eastern Imperial Drinks company. CEO lied directly to the market saying things were looking good - delisted one month later and went into admin and ended up being bought for peanuts. Another was a company who sold solar panels and supposedly had lots of contracts in Scandinavia. CEO lived in Thailand and of course it too after an annual report which stated it had had a 'challenging year' but things were definitely looking up and they were looking forward to updating the market on discussions with potential partners, went into admin just a fortnight later! Again, retail investors totally wiped out. And lastly a bio tech company called Genedrive, where the Directors deliberately embarked on a course of value destruction over a period of 3 or 4 years - one CEO left suddenly and i suspect that was because he didn't want to have anything to do with the plan - only to be replaced by another existing Director. They went from 85m shares and. share price of £1+ and in 4 years the share price went down to 0.2p and the BOD proposed an equity fundraise in which they would end up with over 4 billion shares. In that rare instance a share holder revolt forced a turnaround, led by one particular major share holder, who was then supported by others. The sp has recovered to about 1p and things will one day be ok there but many were wiped out on the way down.

Does TRLS have any significant independent share holders willing to do the same and step in to financially support the company? Answer: no. Hence Marla and Laurie have both put cash in but my suspicious antenna is twitching and telling me a deal has already been done whereby the CEO and co founder will be 'reimbursed' at a later date if they can string this out for as long as possible, allowing Alumni to get as many CLNs away as they can. They've already sold about £1m worth of shares which is amazing for a company which is generating zero income AND whose share price just keeps falling. How do they do this? Enter - stage right - the mms and the good old LSE rulebook. With every day that passes now I have that familiar sinking feeling, along the lines of those other experiences referred to above.

As long as people have their eyes open to the risks then fine. But I don't think it's fair to ramp this stock suggesting it's anything other than a hugely risky play and one that is imho more likely to end up with retail investors losing everything. I could be wrong though.

Again Latino, I have to disagree with you. 'Here's hoping for Dr Marla to come good'

I am not at all convinced Dr Marla is working in the interests of ordinary share holders.

The only thing that makes me remain on the fence here and not sell is that she and Laurie put their own money in. Why? They were the ones responsible for signing the death spiral finance agreement with Alumni. Is this an equity firm they have links with historically or otherwise. It's something I'm trying to look into. Alumni are making such huge profits that could it be them who have persuaded the Directors to put cash in so they can rinse retail of another few hundred thousand pounds and then have a private agreement to pay them that money back later on once TRLS has gone bust and its in the hands of Alumni to sell on? With major pharmas signing agreements it's not at all straight forward what's going on here . My hunch isn't good but there is always a chance that things are actually all fine and they're just awaiting one contract to be signed and then wave Alumni a fond farewell.

It's actually just over £8k of sells today and about £250 of buys.

Why they need to paint this picture is anyone's guess but just be aware they trades at .185 are below the midpoint and are sells. Sadly. LSE just getting it wrong and trying to deceive retail investors.

Latino - be reasonable and sensible please. Many realise the risks here and are ok with them but ffs don't try and paint a picture of positivity!

You mention 'every achievement this company has made'

Does that include the value destruction for share holders to the tune of over 99%? They have a massive montly spend and yet generate zero income. Directors have bought no shares for several years. This is usually the prelude to admin/delist/take private - not a huge success and turnaround.

For balance I will also mention they have several agreements signed recently with global CROs, Pfizer and Johnson and Johnson and the CEo and co-founder have both put their own money into keeping the lights on for another few weeks. $50k is enoughf ro about 4 days. £50k about a week, so I think they have enough cash now to get them into the 2nd or 3rd week of May. Unusual in the extreme for such players to be aligning themselves with a tiny outfit about to go under so what's really going on here? Of course we don't know and won't be told until it's too late. And by that I mean we will either lose everything or make a bundle in an instant when an RNS lands giving us the low down.

If it's delisting can we argue it was done deliberately what with Marla putting her own cash in? Tricky. They've played it well and I'd say everything points to delisting. I say that as someone who has just under £5k in. If there is good news then it's happy days but the likelihood given all the evidence is that retail investors are just funding the death spiral finance agreement and some of that is down to you, Latino, suggesting there is likley to be a good outcome. You don't know that. I don't know it'll be a bad outcome. Going on evidence any sane person would surely agree it doesn't look good. The CLNs will keep coming for as long as gullible retail allow Alumni to profit from their gifted shares at .1p