RE: Subscription model28 Dec 2020 19:51
Hi RestLess,
Interesting post, thanks.
As you say, I have no answers but just my two cents. I subscribed to Spotify for a few years and did the decent thing and switched to Napster when the RTO was announced. The key for me is the point of difference versus Spotify as, given their market share, it's likely we're going to have to pull share from them or bring on new audio platform adopters (which will be much harder IMO). The initial point of difference is likely to be the visual content. Melody have done a great job (and spent a fortune) creating a visual library over the past few years and this would be something that wouldn't be too easy for Spotify to copy, although we already know that they have aspirations. With this in mind, price is an interesting one; do you back you product and go higher than Spotify's premium package of 9.99 a month? Do you go aggressive and under cut with a better product? Is there enough margin to go around, given the pressures we read about on artists. Personally, I'd either go like for like (9.99) or cheaper with a view to a future price increase. I think all attention will need to be on moving Spotify subscribers who are likely to be very price sensitive. The only curve ball being live events, you could play around with pricing a lot here, i.e buy a live event and get a free sub for X amount of time.
Another point of difference Spotify have worked hard to develop is Podcasts (which are free). I wonder if Melody have aspirations in this area? People want to go to one place for their audio/music. The live podcasting scene is healthy and it wouldnt be hard to replicate the model with live podcasts.
In summary, whatever we do should seek to blow Spotify out of the water. The good thing is, with live and pre-recorded shows, we have the point of difference to be able to do so.
All conjecture with little to no knowledge (of anything).