The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
That's the frustrating part that the company identifies good opportunities but then can't fully develop it either because it can't market or secure necessary funding or contracts or off takes. The water business is a good prospect both with the epiphany as well as helios excess water. But they said were in advance discussions 4 months ago and since then there's been no update. As investors we can never make an informed decision because they don't provide enough details, breakdowns or future projections which we can Base our investment decisions on. We were promised brokers note and later some sort of note on our prospects but nothing materialised. From these lows if they can focus on something properly and channel their resources to it we can climb up, probably not enough for LTHs, but new investors can make money only if the company focuses. Good luck all.
With all these companies making massive losses, shows the market is not as rosy as RP would make everyone believe. Yes I know the plus side of hnr as the organic brand and with hydrogen as fertiliser pssible extra 30% growth. The real question is what makes RP confident has he got buyers lined up? Has he fully done his numbers crunching? I know I've become negative about RP but he doesn't instill confidence in me and doesn't break things down for us to make an informed judgement on potential of our prospects.
Overall very dissapointing from RP.. He just can't put together a business plan and see it through to commercialisation. I'm not against axle ring new business opportunities but what I'm unhappy about mainly is that he doesn't offer shareholders clear details of planned activities to explore their working assets. Everything is sudden, random and unclear. And even of its put out there is changed last minute. Undeserving of running this company IMO.
Agree that we should here the outcome of their epp costs and the way forward whether we're progressing the epp project or not. As they've had long enough to test and determine it's viability. As far as the larger stage one is considered don't think theres much there for them to report as it's outside their control.
Good question: what happens with the cannabis now and if sold who receives the money?
It's pointless predicting so but kdnc shows what can happen if the epp is announced and what if there's news of the bigger 12mt stage announced. Glencoe secure off take agreement of 4mtpa for 10 years and potential values of 10 billion is attributed. Think about zioc?
Rkb, I share your feelings. RP has been very disloyal to long term holders be it through broken promises or very poor fundraisers. I'm a long term holder and I've always been fair in my judgement that the company manages to find goos prospects but can't really take them over the line which creates lack of trust on their ability. They've had more than three months since their last rns mentioning that they were in advance discussion about many of their prospects. We've heard absolutely nothing and out of the blue a new business which requires funding. He doesn't update us properly, can't take prospects to commercialisation, can't raise funds from a decent platform, can't raise funds at decent prices, can't engage institutional investors but is still taking a big wage with bonus thrown in. When we fully have commercial success with a long term income stream that is capable of producing revenue surplus to company overheads then we can say he's had success. I think it's a decent opportunity that they're looking to enter, but can't trust RP that he'll be able to succefully commercialise it. Good luck everyone and hope he realises that he's really hurt the sentiments of his shareholders.
This was a very poor placement by RP.
@fadec Why wouldn't dictrict8 continue growing cannabis they had such good results? they also had greater plans didn't they? If it is district8 then it raises many more questions for the switch.
Very poor management, especially RP. It's one thing to see potential in something which RP and management seem to have but another to monetize and get it over the line and that also with minimal dilution. I will be sending an email to find out what the plan is with kansas as that is in their control and why switch when kansas was so close to commercial sales.
Some look at the sp and Base their trades on the momentum which is likely to be created by short term newsflow and exit when a decent profit has been realised. Good and we'll if you can manage to get in and out at the right times. Others will look at the overall company and prospects and Base their decision on the potential growth of the company. That model is risky as SP can fluctuate massively and aim is full of surprises, but if you've researched as well as possible, have good understanding of the plays and their potential and have good communication with directors you can take a longer term approach which can result in massive gains if they work out.
China I'm sorry I won't engage on this with you anymore. Because you keep on drumming up the same stuff and totally disregard everything else. You see the share price and you think it's failure, the market isn't in anyone's control, the large sellers are not in anyone's control, the jv workings are a two way thing. You say the company has failed but I say they've had a stumble. You want the ceo replaced because his failing but the CEO is buying, instutional investors are buying, other BOD are buying. Directors are taking shares as wage. Theyre not seeing failure, theyre seeing opportunity, so they're buying. You're seeing failure, you're not seeing opportunity so you .... Good luck, hope everyone makes money.
No disrespect china but where were you taught that there are guarantees in investing? Why do they have disclaimers? Why do institutions fail? I agree with that dates have been missed which is a negative but then you deduce points from that: could be NVS is not telling us truth, could be that he's telling us the truth but just getting carried away; could be that the forecasts were right but unforseen circumstances have affected plans; could be that's he's changed his plan because there are better opportunities and by that deduction you weigh your options. Like you I'm not happy about missed dates but I've deduced an undertaking of what's happening and why and as a result will hold to see it pan out. Good luck to you and everyone here.
China blue it's okay to be dissapointed but the way you're becoming more and more negative and totally disregarding any positives is quite remarkable. Share price of aim comoanies never follow the normal metrics of the other markets that's why good CEOs, even NVS, doesn't comment on share price. As you're aware SOLG went from 14p to 1p as mentioned by a SOLG investor also they've been going on for some time yet. It's always good to analyse your investment and from time to time re-evaluate the case. From my viwe point the investment has negatives which you point out but I think there are more positives and from these prices the upside potential is good. Time frame is also not in our control so you've got to be flexible with time too and that's what patience is. The market can remain irrational far longer than you and I can remain rational. Are you over exposed in ARCM?
Please don't invest based on posters projection on here. Research yourself and perhaps take pointers from this board, but only invest once you've learnt enough about the company and what they're doing.
Chinablue you're not as old as Don Bailey are you? lol. The guy has great track record, great contacts and years of experience of Zambian environment, he was taken up role here and is currently 82 years old and despite his age has opted of shares at 7p in lieu of wage and participated in the placements at 4.5p and here. The investment case here is a good one and that's why at 82 he's doing what he's doing IMO. Good luck all