Member Info for riptonk

I agree. Could go anywhere. It is a bad RNS whether people agree or not - the market has taken 20%. I've lost count of the number of times on AIM that an RNS is used to hack price to pieces to allow friends to stack up for a later RNS rocket. Picking your price and timing is key.

The only thing that matters is the share price.

I trade charts. I know everybody has their system and people trading the same system can interpret things differently. However, I can't help feeling sometimes (especially reading this message board) that the majority have a system based on research?? (in italics). Every system should have a stop loss. Topping up is terrible. Commenting endlessly about stocks you are not in is not going to lead to success etc. This is a strange graveyard.

I'm happy to be in at this price. Sympathies to those who have lost their money though.

A little strange but Sense posted a message on here earlier that admitted what everybody concluded a long time ago as to why he had tried to single handledly drive down price and what his motivations were etc - this now looks to have been removed (perhaps by LSE themselves because they had looked to have blocked his Johnny account too). Can I encourage everybody to report any further posts on here should they appear from him because it would be very nice to get this back to a discussion board as intended and not be driven by what clearly is a bit of a mixed up character (and he did it every day too!) Hopefully a new phase - good luck everybody and looking forward to see how that very optimistic RNS earlier in the year is going to impact results. We shall see.

Funny and sad in equal measure.

Let's also ask why Johnny/Sense is here. For those who are new to this board, I'm sorry to say that we are plagued daily by an ex shareholder who has broken the rule of trading by getting emotional about losses. And I mean very, very emotional. So much so that he writes from multiple accounts like some upset child who just wants to wreak some weird revenge no matter how much energy it costs him.

'Legacy'? That's quite an ego you have there.

Just as I said. Now move along Jingbin.

I've been watching your activity alot. Discussion and questioning is one thing but if you continue to post when you have no position in this company then there is only one conclusion to come to.

My SL was hit today and I never make any exceptions for SLs. Disappointing but this company looks good so GL to all.

I've just looked at the chart indicators I use for Forex and they look fine. Consolidation would bring the Bollinger Bands up to meet price and create an excellent set up. It's a pity I wasn't paying attention on 19th January because that really was perfect.

If you watched the VOX presentation last week then, fair play to them, they read the situation correctly in predicting some volatility but mainly consolidation for a week or two. They also said this was a raving screaming buy at 3.50. Since this is close enough and the upside is so large then I don't see any reason to fart around being too choosey about the entry. Ive doubled up again this afternoon - the longer it hangs around the more I will free up other monies and add to my account.

I've looked at LGO but I'm not sure how exploration of such low volume can cope with unexpected costs or disappointments. I think I'm going to plump for FTSV because I'm a solar power believer - not sure about the Shard address though - I'd prefer real money to go to the industrial part fo the company. Maybe half to IGAS so thanks for that suggestion - it looks like the price has life.

Thank you Daniel Chiu and thank you LSE! Strangely my anger has strengthened - maybe I shouldn't look at CGH any more.