Member Info for RichTheNewbie

CW25 - I suspect they'd just looked at the MorningStar link and wanted to seem prophetic ;)

Or question rather.

Ghia - Yes...I realise this....but my point where was do MorningStar get their data ;)

Bella - eh?
The SP is exactly where it has been capped for ages and clearly Acacia (or Miton) are still selling (and have been since the date on those last TR-1s).

Ghia - I think some of it is old data. The entries all seem to have a last update date on the end. So I'd go with that for the most recent indication. Not sure where morningstar get the data for these people below the notifiable threshold.

As I just posted elsewhere, the MorningStar link someone provided has helped fill in the remaining pieces of puzzle to me and I think it's quite simple actually. I thought Acacia would be down a little more.....however that link shows it wasn't just Acacia selling. It was Miton too.
So I think all the order book games are easy to explain now. We had Acacia doing most of the selling but Miton have been selling too. So two competing sellers.
We can also see a fund (Chelverton) increasing in the past (and I suspect there's been another one recently, especially on the day of highly aggressing buying into the sell order capping the price). Maybe it's them raising their position or someone else.
So we've simply seen the price capped by two sellers and at certain points in time another II buyer takes lumps out of them (along with PIs). Miton only have 1.6m left as of four days ago according to MorningStar. Acacia probably have 9/10/11m left.
Shouldn't be too much longer before the brakes of these two finally come off.

Fecks sake (version = versus).

Also shows Miton reducing (1.6m left as of 30th Jun). So there's probably been games between new buying versions Acacia flipping and one fund reducing. That's been the backdrop and all should be done soon :)

TrekMadone - I'm well aware of the DTR rules. As I say, I suspect you'll find so are Acacia, and have probably checked their responsibilites, and there is a way round it with block trades, being done for them, without falling foul of the rules.

holding=holder

ALGY7/Dave - Sorry I take your point. Licht was previously excluded but not them. Perhaps it's just an oversight on their part (or they've just recategorised them not as a major holding since they're clearly just flipping them rather than investing).

ALGY7 - no it's a sum of lansdowne (II)+directors. Licht is public.

It's not strange....Acacia have notified them they were down to 7.5% at a certain point in time and Synairgen have updated their website to reflect that! It's exactly what you'd expect.

I'm being serious. I don't think you understand the TR-1's and are jumping to conclusions wrongly.

I suspect Acacia are probably operating within the rules and there appear likely to be some exemptions for block trades (better articles from law firms I've found so far require payment so not sure :p).

Yes. It's easy. Those are two snapshots of their holding at a certain point on a certain day.
The 3m trade could be as a result of a load of buys spanning several days/weeks being filled from their holding of a lot more than 3m.
It might be that they've given the broker batches to sell, and when the 3m was done, you saw it hit the feed.
I think you're just misunderstanding the TR-1s.

No but you're not understanding them. They're just a momentary snapshot. You seem to be wrongly inferring something about them not selling.

No. That's not how it works.

This has been answered already endlessly shan....

Those RNSs don't tell you that.