Member Info for Ricardo2019

Hi Heid, apologies because this question comes out of part laziness (in that I should be able to dig through the RNSes to get the answer) but I know you will know this immediately... I've lost track of which sites have the restrictions on output due to planning. With the restricted choke, how much could that be 'legally' opened up? Is there a planning limit on that particular well? Thanks in advance.

Hi Daz423,

> I find it interesting your names only come up on KOD today ?
> Are you in TM by any chance?

I have been KOD since 10 May 2021 at 0.1999p with a small investment. I don't know what TM is, sorry. What is that? I am in KAV, XTR and ARCM though.

I don't tend to post too much in KOD as my knowledge tends to be more on the military and geopolitical side, than exploratory and mining operations. I'm just lurking waiting for the good stuff to happen!

Anything else aside, I'd much rather be in UJO today than 88e. Big ouch.

> It will have interest in its resources over polotics as per other previous movements its made.

We might be violently agreeing here, but I would say that the two are inextricably intertwined in that where resources are involved then politics will always be of interest, so for that person to say the Russians have no interest in Malian politics is disingenuous (and smells of having a bias or agenda).

I can't comment on whether there is true support or not. All I can say is that I would be very suspicious of people potentially being incentivised in some way to hold Russian flags, as that sort of thing is straight out of their playbook. Were there to be other supporting (and credible) evidence that would do a lot to lower my suspicions.

Please don't feel obligated to reply if you want to get on with your day - I won't feel slighted. :-) I could do with getting some stuff done myself!

Hi Cloves, it was more a respectful suggestion than a question (but I admit my use of a question mark was not great English).

Hi rafafan, thank you. Yes, too much confusion between speculation/assumptions/interpretations and actual facts.

> Russia has no interest in Malian politics

When you read obvious nonsense like this, one instantly knows not to trust that source.

Wow, you assume a lot, Cloves. That's a huge jump from 'that's an opinion' to 'there's illegality here'. Can we not just either start sticking to the facts, or if you aren't sure, ask a clarifying question?

> comment

Depends what you mean by 'comment'. Everyone's personal commentary is opinion, but sometimes posts are stating facts, e.g. quoting from an RNS or some other credible source.

In the case of the OP I interpreted that as as The AimCasino's personal take on the RNS, and I think Pboo is quite correct to point out that's it's an opinion - an interpretation of facts - and not a statement of actual fact that can be attributed to a source.

> Three months is a normal timeframe - then they are considered as "valid" for investors for another 6 months

Thanks Mirasol. Not too bad then, roughly the same as a CPR it sounds like. Now if only I could switch off and come back in the summertime! :)

Nice RNS but disappointed (because I am impatient to hear the good news!) that there was no mention of any sort of timescale to see the new report. Does anyone have an idea how long these Reserves and Resources Reports generally take?

Good. CPR will come when done.

Leak enquiry is now an unnecessary distraction. Unfortunate that 'justice' won't be done - but if you're investing in AIM shares and expecting justice then I have a bridge to sell to you.

Thanks for reposting, Daisy1963, and to gilesfitzh for making the original comments.

Good to know you are still around gilesfitzh!

Couldn't agree more with your points - good things will come to those who wait. I'll be happy with either significant dividends or a high-priced buyout at some stage.

> If Eua were in a position to pay out a dividend next week I hope they’ll hold off till the dust has settled abit.

I don't like that idea, unless they are holding it outside the reach of Putin. And if they are, why should they hold off - unless they were holding it in Rubles (and waiting for the Ruble to strengthen)?

@Potter79 - ah well if your lowest retirement age is 55 then you have slightly longer than me then until retirement. :)

> You will have split the fees for the BOAGF as SL take a portion of that 1.5%.
Hmm, very good point. I'll keep my eyes peeled for more detail on SL's cut too. And I agree with your point about the 2B plan - a 3B plan would be much better.

@Daisy1963 - "I will post them so the experts can dissect them." - that would be great to read, thank you. And Giles has been unusually quiet since last year. Wonder where he/she is?

Shamelessly bumping this as I'd really welcome views on my workings.

If I'm right then that's £9m revenue PA against a current market cap of only £1m more. Which would be great if anywhere near accurate.

Hi Potter79, I've been in since Aug 2018 myself. I invested with the long term in mind, as I could see the potential to grow steadily over time. I'm invested this cash for retirement (a way off) so if the company takes a while to build solid foundations then I can live with that. I have also lowered my expectations, but for the short to medium term. For the long term I still see ALGW as being very cash generative. I'm expecting the SP growth curve to be a bit more like Amazon than say, a miner hitting a load of gold like GGP. So more gradual growth with some SP regression here and there.

Since you are a long term holder I'd be interested to hear more about your expectations, and I'd also be interested to hear your thoughts on my rough calcs in my recent thread 'Spitballing future revenues'.

> Seems that was the goal in the first place.

Putin originally told his people that he wanted all of Ukraine back with Russia. Yeah he could have been lying but the troop movements certainly align with what he said.

> not only risky but very risky.

Oh I'd go further and suggest this and many other AIM shares are amongst the most risky investments available to the public. Having said that, there has been an element of de-risking by UJO with their progress and I personally am confident of a successful future. Albeit, considering I also bought SXX, FRR and HUR I wouldn't take my word for it! but overall, I think you make a valid point about the risk here.

> And if you think the 500 or so apparent lost tanks is huge, as per your reputable third parties, think again

Mac, I recommend reading around 'combat readiness'.