Member Info for rhubarbmk2

Bullish.

I wouldn't worry. Along with terrier, I've never read a post from him that hasn't made me want to throw myself off the nearest bridge.

I am happy to be corrected, but my recollection is periodic eeyore-type posts to tell us how the world will shortly end on the stock market, but only for VAL holders.

Thanks Ells. I may use that work experience to further my biotech investment knowledge. Cheers for the advice.

Jenny; LH is spot on.

You have evidence that "Ells" is pumping and dumping, but I'm not aware of the same regarding Porky.

And you've also played the irresistible game of "I sold at X, and, because I'm very clever, I bought back at Y".

So your argument carries little weight, and, due to the above, I believe you've done a disservice to your previously excellent posting acumen.

I'll wet myself laughing if Suzy suddenly releases a left field RNS along the lines of BC201 presents spike protein, nucleocapsid, and RNA assembly in SARS-Cov2.

It would be the most under-acknowledged COVID play in the existence of PLC. I actually forgot to add it to my list, such is the wealth of the expanding portfolio.

We could have a bone fide sepsis TA here, and we hardly ever talk about it; myself included.

And - to be fair to Porky - if you can't be bullish when we have new management; no need to raise; 2 clinical-stage TA's; 1 IND-stage TA; 1 validation TA, and up to 60 others going through due diligence, all for a MCap of 30M, then when you can you?

It's like the inverse of 80% of the biotech AIM's.

What a fantastic opportunity.

I'm worried that we've all been shivering in the dark for too long, and are now in danger of shooting new members who come to provide some FIRE!

Yes - no one likes a pump and dump, but we are a long way from that. We now have real substance.

Look around at the peers and LesGO!

Don't worry Porky; anyone who reads your posts would know you're not ST. It won't stop the "knight-in-shining-armour-trying-to-save-other-shareholders" type, putting the boot in, though.

The way I see it; you get moderates, informed rampers (enjoying the ride), uninformed rampers (trying to spike), derampers trying to get in lower, derampers who have the time to come and complain about the old board, because they're no longer in and hate that, and the worst-type; the misery-loves-company poster. My God, I'd hate to be one of those.

I actually find it rather patronising to general shareholders that "the knights" think they need to shield them (either way) from "accidentally" selling, or buying, because they are evidentially all a bunch of imbeciles who can't read a wide body of posts, and come to their own informed decision.

St. Tropez gets a lot of flak. Yes; he was Uber bullish, but he was right about getting a good heads-up on the 201 data, and he was right in that the data should have sent the SP flying (I always thought 45-50p, incidentally, before partnering news; whereas we've now pretty much got that in the bag).

Where he became massively unstuck is that he (and me) failed to predict both how the RNS would be twisted and manipulated to sink the SP, and also the fact that many stale LT sufferers bailed or offloaded significantly.

I think, to an extent, we are still seeing a reaction to that legacy of events. People are still wary that the SP will spike and want to bag some profit now; hence the situation at the psychological barriers of 30p/40p/50p etc. In this instance, though, it's healthy, as new hands will enter positions at this new benchmark. And it is significantly greasing the market.

It's also good to get some level of rerate before official news.

Either way, I see no reason to believe that it's not currently a strong buy, but DYOR.

I bought more, because just one of the new candidates, taken to late preclinical phase testing, could be worth multiples of the current MCap. And they've been trawling through 60.

I also know that if anyone can achieve this, and be able to follow through with an acquisition, then Suzy and her team can.

Oh yes - as an aside, there's the legacy compounds :-)

No - there wouldn't be one anyway NPF. You'd need 10%, or a group representing 10% (which would take only 2 or 3 of the posters on this very page) to block a section 979 squeeze out, if it was done via the way of share purchases (up to 90%).

It would be virtually impossible to buy VAL via the above, unless they approached the management with an offer which would have to be presented to shareholders.

Look at OB; they'd have no chance with that method either.

VAL isn't set up for selling IMO.

Saved SP Angel some time there Porkster.

Totally with you, as usual, pal.

Hoping Suzy got a decent innings, and I'll say it again.

1. 95% of "leaders" would shy from the roast.

2. Best AIM CEO by a looooooooooong stretch.

Have a good weekend all.

2:2, 37.5:38

Tight.

You lucky rascals.

Porkster. I'm dying to know.

When do you sleep?

I think the issue with many LT but loyal holders Porky, is that they were badly burn't last Autumn, with the bull pressure, and subsequent sell-off, due to the way the RNS was disseminated and (erroneously) interpreted.

I think, therefore, that some would rather see the SP re-rate on news, rather than pre-news, to a sustainable, and much higher level.

That being said, I've always held that we should be sitting on 45-50p, in no knowledge of potential partners, and without the new strategy, so I would have to agree that we are now significantly undervalued. In light of that, I still maintain that your posts are a breath of fresh air.

I'm sure on news that the stagnation will release, and trust will be fully restored in the Company, by all, to a degree that reflects my current outlook toward Suzy and the team.

Obviously come RNS day, we will get the usual suspects flying in to say "it's only XM, that's not enough", but these folk would want 500M upfront to zip their choppers, so you'll never please anyone; I am braced for that.

Either way, II's and those who invest based on real revenue, rather than expectation (which many do) will do their own cold hard calculations, and I expect will buy in at significantly higher levels that we are seeing today.

In essence, it's very nice to get some positivity back, and I'm behind you on that, but I think the above probably encapsulates some of the responses you might get. To those folk, I would just say that, at this level, it's good to get an active bull investor, like Porky, on-board, and hopefully there will be more to come. Before or after news doesn't really bother me personally, because it will happen, but don't shoot a member of your own team.

You cannot fault Suzy's willingness to be questioned.

Have you seen the other CEO's giving it "okay then", when asked to be scrutinised?

Biggest cojones on the AIM by far. Good on her.

I think you're great, son.

Breath of fresh air, as we had set in for the graveyard shift.

Crack on.

Thanks Ice - very informative and great to hear your take.

That's a good buy; shooting my TA theory down in the process, but I'm pleased that it has :-)