Member Info for redindi

Lewbo

Yes, very telling. No doubt also SEYE has yet to attempt to get DO-178C which is even more onerous than ISO26262 which SEYE hasn't got. If only people did some research they wouldn't come across as so.......

S7

Stop contradicting yourself. Only a few days ago you said the two companies were aiming at different markets. So obvious.

#doingnoresearchisaskingfortrouble

Smart Eye are like SWF.

True, you should keep your eye on them but if SEYE is 3/4 years behind in Auto, it's 6/8 years behind in Aviation which is even more focused on safety. In effect, SEE doesn't have competition in this field as Bauch said.

Lewbo

Not sure this could be classed as the public domain but the CEO of a listed company just said, in public, Auto is hardwired to double every year to 2025?

Major

Or it could be that a certain head of Auto is notoriously conservative with his contract values and that this is the actual, expected value of existing contracts. Still be good to see what you described though)))

Terry

So if Safestocks was a strong sell signal (which I don't think it was, Chris Menon I'm sure would have said) is this interview a strong buy signal?

Zeq

According to Cenkos, just under A$9 million Fy20, so 18, 36,72, 144 & $288 million in FY25.

Cenkos certainly don't have it doubling in the early years. They have A$10.2 & 15.7 million in FY21 & 22. Auto and BdMS combined.

Provide intoxication monitoring that should read.

TLS

Indeed, and from memory, at the CMD, Tim confirmed (possibly too much) that SEE did intoxication. As far as I am aware the number of DMS providers who do DMS is one.

We await with anticipation the confirmation that is so.

The last sentence, intoxication?

https://auto.hindustantimes.com/auto/cars/volvo-limits-top-speed-of-its-cars-to-180-kmph-introduces-care-key-for-safety-41589970656796.html

As you were saying Lewbo, the derampers come along and say absolutely nothing but diatribe without any real foundation. Very obvious

Lewbo

Well put. Some on here seem to believe being negative about anything, changing their stance completely in the space of 24 hours doesn't go unnoticed but it does. Too obvious by half.

In the current circumstances, today's RNS was very positive, to paint it any other way is totally disingenuous and I'm sure they know it.

Just for here, well done the management for making the necessary decisions required and which leave SEE in a stronger position than was apparent at the start of the day and is exactly what the derampers were asking. Chutzpah

Fonz

Let's keep it factual and within the parameters of the question. I can't say no more than that.

Seeing as it's a quiet Tuesday afternoon, here's a quiz -

Whichever poster is the only one who has used the following three words to describe other posters who don't agree with his negativity?

Moron(s), clowns and jokers (could also be idiot somewhere).

No other poster uses language similar to this poster so shouldn't be too hard.

Sometimes people's opinions are clouded by their needs and really do say things quite probably to themselves to justify their stance.

Not only are they world experts on particular companies but also epidemiology. No one who comes on this board knows what is going to happen but it's equally as likely the economy will recover quickly. But who knows, not me.

And even with a pandemic, it does not mean business stops, look where SEE is based and where most of it's customers are based and also have a good read of the Half Year results, plenty of confidence if you actually read something.

Alternatively, which area of the world is now the epicentre of the pandemic. I bet the resilience of the market for Guardian has even surprised people there....

Smokey funny? Ah, got it now, he's one of the clowns!

Sorted.

I always find it infuriating when a factual book only tells half the facts, leaving out those that don't help the authors narrative.

Lewbo

I've worked it out now. If a broker note is positive, we're to disregard it, especially the house broker who is likely to have better insight than either other brokers or PIs. The same goes for any positive BB posts based on factual information. However, any negative posts based purely on someone's opinion, which could be driven by the need of a lower buy price, we are to treat as though it's gospel and of course sell our shares.

Sorted.

These payments are most definitely worth having and they're grants as far as I can see, similar to the UK schemes available.

I wonder how many of the previously reported 268 employees were /are eligible. Whatever, it will certainly help the cash balance enough to not merit a placement prior to profitability.

https://www.business.gov.au/Risk-management/Emergency-management/Coronavirus-information-and-support-for-business/JobKeeper-Payment-for-employers-and-employees

Jins

Yes, good note from Cenkos which I'm sure we've all read and agree with. So much so in fact that I've had a top up, without selling one share in SEE earlieR!

#readtheflippingnotes