Member Info for Redheadedrager

This is most unexpected. Nothing but positive in the RNS for me, but I may be just plain dumb. Can someone explain why those results aren’t good? Red

@morroccoknows - OK then. Name them. Just a couple of criteria. They have to be in a jurisdiction that is rated as stable as the U.K., they have to be analogous with Wytch Farm in terms of long term production capability, and they have to be be sitting on a potential oil ocean of over 10bn barrels (to be commercially proven obviously):-)

As I recall it was around £350m

Evidence on Twitter . . . Keep up ;-)

Looks like they were reopening the plugs yesterday, so wondering what the state of play is at the moment. . . Interesting times indeed!

@TerrySn - give a rest you old buffer, you really haven’t a clue . . .

With all this institutional investment (£12.5m) in a very short space of time, surely some entity must be nudging fairly close to the 3% limit. . . Interesting times.

However surely now there can be no questions over cash burn ;-)

TBH that was not the news I was expecting or looking forwards too. Hmph. Hey ho, another day. Let’s see if we get flows today ;-)

. . . .

Take your profits and drop it in UKOG. U.K. onshore oil exploration play with assets in the Weald just about to commence extended well test of Horse Hill to prove commerciality.

Please review posts of TerrySn which are consistently and baselessly, and in blatant disregard of the facts, seeking to destabilise the discussion on this board with groundless innuendo that the actions of the board of UKOG are contrary to the objectives of bone-fire shareholders.

And up we tick . . . . ;-)

@Boyzee - now you see it . . . ;-)

@amr01 - UKOG isn’t a steam engine, but you are at the end of the line. Into the filter bin you go!

@amr01 - with respect. Analysis such as that doesn’t rally apply in explorer such as UKOG. More appropriate is the value of recoverable oil in the ground. Once producing your analysis becomes more helpful ;-)

Boyzee - have you sold out in a blind panic yet? Oh, sorry you already did that on Wednesday last week . . . .

Boyzee, just think before you write. I know it’s a bit challenging, but give it a go for once ;-)

@Boyzee - yes, ANGS are risking being forcibly delisted from AIM for not complying with the listing rules over timely release of market sensitive information in order to help out a direct competitor. Makes right proper sense that. You utter moron.

@makflush - yeah, right. Move along now.