Member Info for Redheadedrager

Pijoe - I’m not arguing that you’re not experienced, I am arguing that people read and interpret the facts. This is the whole point behind the Weald play. Big oil looked, didn’t find it. Walked away. Other notable researchers and geologists stated it’s not possible to get any oil out of the Weald. But UKOG have done it, Angus have done it. We’re on the cusp of proving it out, yet a lot of people are coming onto the bulletin board with an obvious agenda of stating that UKOG can’t / wont produce oil, despite all the evidence of it happening being there. As to valuation, well, the market values an asset based upon supply and demand, personally I don’t really care if UKOG drops to 1p tomorrow (obviously that wouldn’t be ideal) because I have confidence in the data that’s been presented to date that the probability of returning commercial oil in significant quantities is high enough to underpin the level of investment I’ve made here. EWT willl prove this out. Red

@Boyzee - ah, yes, right-ho. Will do. ;-)

@pijoe

so based on published reports only (lots of room to manoeuvre if not the case?) - yep because I base my views on published reports, what else would I base them on? Of course, the unpublished reports, yes, lets go and look those up. Yep, got there all here along with Elvis and Martians. Sheesh.

so based on "stable dry oil flow"(lots of manoeuvre on flow rates?). As a comparable indicator it’s as good as any other, once in production I’m sure we’ll get a lot more compartive analytics.

"is likely" - (so not a fact and stated as such) - I refer the honorable gentleman to his own answer in point above - they couldn’t be absolute since there may be ‘unpublished’ data which they have no sight of.

"wild cat" - (so EWT wells have flowed more?). Yes, again, comparable indicator. It’s a non-optimized exploratory well and it still ****ed out oil. When optimised it’ll deliver more. Again we can then compare to other EWT’s and then other production wells when in production.

um.. you sure you read the RNS's carefully? i do. Yep but you can’t interpret them for $H!T.

Cockernoe - so you’re saying that B.B. failed because of replenishment? Not the fact that they’d stuffed up the wells? Hmmm . . . Very interesting.

OK. So . . . .

?me?

Also, numbnuts BB is free flowing from the Kimmeridge. Please read the RNS or ask a well meaning adult to draw you a picture, it might make it a bit clearer for you. Oh, and stay off the crack pipe, that’ll help too. Red

@Hopenpray - seems very threatening language you’re using there. Seem quite aggressive. Quite T R 0 L L like indeed. Why don’t you calm down? BTW HH has flowed, is currently flowing and will continue to flow in the future. So far 618 barrels of sweet light crude have been tankers out and sold. I’m not sure but I’m pretty confident that there’s a lot more on site and soon we’ll have an update re the Portland rates, which I am looking forwards to immensely. Have a lovely evening! Red

Well this little drop on no news is exciting isn’t it? Got to love the market, very unpredictable. . . I’m getting paid tomorrow. May top up a few thousand shares if it stays at this price . . . Hmmmmm. Red

@DirtySanchez599 - well, lovely of you to pop in a gal race us with your presence and pearls of wisdom. Obviously you know nothing about UKOG or the Weald, so why don’t you Foxtrot Oscar, there’s a good boy ;-) Red

From a pretty hefty tree shake . . . May well get very interesting this afternoon as the information from Vonk’s interview is absorbed. . . Hopefully onwards and upwards! Reduce

@Stocktaker01 - your moniker seems to expose your true intentions. Speaking with a forked tongue by simultaneously seeking our trust by saying you hold yet sowing seeds of doubt about the stock being pumped does you no favours at all. Snakes speak with forked tongues. Into the bin you go serpent. :-) Red

I think we need the RNS announcing Portland unrestricted initial flow rates, and sustainable on pump flow rate. Also an update on the unrestricted free flow rate (without the pump). Once the market knows that info we should move on at a clip. Follow that up with Portland commerciality announcement and then early Kimmeridge results and we should be on AG1 heading for the stratosphere!

. . . as tight as a gnat’s chuff at 7.966 / 8.125 p . . . This is going to be interesting into the close, albeit volume has dropped off a little bit this afternoon. I think bets have now been placed ahead of Vonks interview tomorrow . . . ;-) Red

Doh! Wrong board - ha ha ha - what a turnip I am. . . Sorry people as you were ;-)

. . . as tight as a gnat’s chuff at 7.966 / 8.125 p . . . This is going to be interesting into the close, albeit volume has dropped off a little bit this afternoon. I think bets have now been placed ahead of Vonks interview tomorrow . . . ;-) Red

We seem to be on track for our largest trading day ever, on no news - just expectation. Well, it’s very interesting indeed. I’m in both ANGS and UKOG and I think that what is good for one is good for the other. We’re both in the business of proving up and ultimately (and appreciate we are currently!) commercially extracting oil from the Weald. Great day here and hopefully we’ll get some news soon - the retrospective permission approval on the 8th could very well see us re-rate very quickly back towards the peaks of last year, I think we’ll be well into double figures and possibly over 20p at that point. Even if not that high then certainlyminto the low teens within a fortnight given a favourable result. Good luck everyone ;-) Red

Something is definitely afoot. Closing in on year highs for volumes. Well done everyone who bought on the dip a couple of weeks back. For everyone else who has been trapped in here since the 30p+ days, this is the start of our recovery :-) Red

@gregorio - you appear to be a rather nasty piece of work actually. Why don’t you Foxtrot Oscar back from whence you came. See you Next Tuesday! Red

@Superman86 - remind me to not add you to my party list. Wow. Whoosh and the oxygen leaves the room. . . .