RE: Telfer25 Jan 2026 11:36
I agree Rotherby1, to a certain extent at least, but I am no expert.
Shaun is constrained in what he can and can't say as things currently stand. The drilling results are not yet converted into formal resource estimates so, even though Shaun may know how good they are, he cannot announce it yet. And by that same reasoning he can't talk of future expansion plans that would rely on that information. It would look speculative and Shaun wouldn't be so foolish.
However, once formalised that narrative may change? Facilitated by a long Telfer mine life extension, new opportunities become possible, and that may raise the question about how best to develop Haveiron. GGP could produce nigh-on 600k oz per year (or more?) with Telfer and Haveiron running separately. To me that looks too good an opportunity to pass up, if it can be achieved at reasonable cost. But with Telfer spewing out cash, and looking like it will continue to do so for the foreseeable future, who knows?
As for dividends I agree. However, the extra cost of developing Haveiron as a completely separate mine may delay, but would almost certainly constrain, what is available to be paid out, even if GGP utilise some form of debt facility to cover the lion's share of that cost. That has the potential to knock the SP over the short term, which is the concern I raised earlier.